lounge
Discord ID: 484514023698726912
1,016,926 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 162/4068
| Next
vacuum is basically nothing
yep
a rocket, generating its own thrust, would fly in the vacuum
don't think so
thrust needs something to push off of
here, tell me how rockets work
what they do to generate thrust
they are propelling gas out the back end to push it forward
thats all you need to say
in an atmosphere they have something to push off of
and something to push into
which slows down the rocket
in a vacuum they have nothing to push off of
rocket won't move
and nothing to push into
you have a guy with a master's degree in technical physics
telling you it won't move
lol
did you watch the videos I linked?
i saw your example already
i did for a bit
one guy with a MSc > 100% of rocket physicists
just showed a disturbing portrait of a man
this guy has a master's degree in technical physics
let me see
he's telling you it has nothign to push off of, it won't work
and hes wrong
because he apparently doesnt understand rockets
well, the link is up above
lets read newtons third law by quote shall we?
For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction.
maybe we should watch this video and see if he address it
goopy
srry
so if I flap my arms in a vacuum, am I going anywhere?
nope
no medium to propel you up
if I take an oxygen tank in a vacuum and start releasing gas, am I going to move anywhere?
if you let the gas out at a very fast speed and a very high pressure, you're going to fall backwards from the force of the gas ejecting out the tank
if you let it drizzle out nope
nope, won't matter
have you tried it yourself or are you just saying so
you might get thrust but I don't think so, not significant amount
depending on how fast the oxygen comes out ya you might not get much, but you still get it
on the plus side any thrust would be better in a vacuum though
yes it would
because you don't need alot of thrust to move, unlike atmosphere
no air resistance
indeed
you still have the problem of pushing the amount of mass foward
in a vacuum with no air resistance would make it easier
true
but the rocket has to get there first
so it trudges on through the atmosphere
still amount of mass matters because it limits how much thrust you need to generate to move the entire mass, and stop it
the more mass the more thrust
suffice it to say that although it might function some, it wouldn't work enough to land on the moon and take off again, land back on earth
let me find a fun fact real quick
the more mass means the more thrust you need to move it
even in a vacuum
All Apollo missions carried and used around 5,625,000 pounds of propellant in all three modules and the Saturn V launch vehicle. This is for the whole trip, with the greatest amounts being used in the first minutes [to achieve orbital velocity] by the Saturn V rocket.
*thats a lot of propellant*
you don't just have to propel the rocket, you also have to propel all that propellant itself
keep in mind i dont believe in space like the globe earth model says it is or that we went to the moon, im just saying if we were in the ge model it would be possible
the more you take the less opitmal it is
you heard about them losing all their trajectory records?
let me find how heavy the rocket is
3,039,000kg
sounds like fiction to me, 5 million lbs of propellant
yea, I don't beleive that
you know NASA is one of the biggest userse of helium
they put helium in all their sattelites, they are just big high tech balloons
helium is a great way to eject materials out faster and is used in rockets yes
cause outer space is a lie and a false myth
i wouldn't put it that harshly but ya
well, do you really think we landed on the moon on flat earth?
but can we agree if the rocket had over 5.6m pounds of fuel and weighed that much it could reach the said escape velocity?
nope
but if the ge model were true id say yes
no, I don't believe they had that much
do you think it could though if they did have that much?
what they had was enough fuel to crash the rocket into the ocean and pretend to land on the moon on a movie set
i think that too
but im just asking if you think it would have been possible if they did have the fuel
since outer space is completely fake I don't think they really understand how rockets would work in that environment
I don't think it works the way they say it would
we do have that giant vacuum chamber
you know we put someone in a vacuum and they passed out in 1965
we don't even do that anymore
they practice in a swimming pool because that is where the international swimming pool does all its swim walks
well duh they had no oxygen to breath lol
ya
the guy who passed out was in a space suit that didn't work well
well i think if the did have that much fuel they could get to their said moon if it existed
cool
i think thats when they improved the decal of the suits lol
good talk kevin
so it was an accident rather than a suit malfunction
huh
I am not enirely cetain what happened but we don't put people in vacuum's anymore
indeed
too dangerous and its not like they are going to space and need to practice for that envirnment
true
do you believe in gravity?
gravity is fake
hi
PING
<:whopinged:489114411387191296> <:whopinged:489114411387191296> <:whopinged:489114411387191296>
pings
...
โ **You have to be in a voice channel to use this command.**
<:angery:486195953410244608> Stay back devils
<:youtube:335112740957978625> **Searching** ๐ `Dave funky friday`
**Playing** ๐ถ `Dave - Funky Friday (ft. Fredo)` - Now!
<:youtube:335112740957978625> **Searching** ๐ `this house Tom Macdonald`
**Skipping?** (1/2 people)
โ **You have to be in a voice channel to use this command.**
Great
this is a banger
Stop pinging me
<:GWqlabsFeelsFunnyMan:398950861361119233> You motherfuckers
Get the fuck out of here
Damn trolls
<@393089067509612546> both mods are gone
YAY
They are gone
Nice
!np
this song wasn't too bad tbh
So
Tacos
?
!np
ew fuck Tom MacDonald
how to I change the song?
Vortex would have banned them eventually
!play sampha treasure
<:youtube:335112740957978625> **Searching** ๐ `sampha treasure`
!skip
โฉ ***Skipped*** ๐
!play miserable america
<:youtube:335112740957978625> **Searching** ๐ `miserable america`
**Playing** ๐ถ `Kevin Abstract - MISERABLE AMERICA` - Now!
gang weed is legal in canada tomorrow
great example of how far a liberal society strays from values
๐ค
how is that a liberal society straying from values
Canadian taxes are higher than a fucking kite
@Citizen Z why did you ping me in bible study? I canโt see that room
You asked about god
You need to get a role to see it there
Oh
Kk
not its values
straying from gods values
obvious
god is anti weed?
never knew that
Lol
not anti weed
just anti vice
im sure he is ok with weed existing just not using it as a drug
besides it is not the weed that is the problem it is criminals
thank you to whomever gave me truther
Yw. ๐
and legalizing weed helps decrease weed use, helps the economy, stop throwing hundreds of harmless people in jail, and makes it so more people will get help if they need it
Just tax the shit out of it
and weaken illigal organizations
I'll be fine with it if we just treat them like cigarettes
^
there are more productive ways to degrees less harmful drug use
rockets don't work in a vacuum
Then how would jets fly high up
doesnt the air get more like a vacuum the higher you go
some jets fly very high
airlinners typically fly at 30,000 feet
there are aircrat that can fly higher, but they have to fly faster to get lift
i mean like military jets
yeah
if a rocket couldnt work in a vacuum wouldnt the jets not work
Jet engines require a medium to run, dont they?
There is a key difference between a rocket and a jet. A rocket doesn't use lift to fly. So an airplane can't work in a vacuum since nothing to push the wings up. A rocket ejects super heated gas backwards, which then push it forward
Also, while not extremely important. A jet engine uses oxygen from the air, while rockets have their own oxygen internally
That last part is key. Rockets bring their own oxygen, while airplanes get it from the air they move through.
that is just fuel of the engines, not how they propel things through the air/stay up
Rockets use pure thrust
yes, and jets use the differnce of air pressure under and over the wing to stay up
Yes
my point, rockets use thrust, while jets use difference in air pressure. thus you can say just because a jet doesnt work in a vacuum doesnt mean a rocket works in a vacuum
Oh thats not what I'm saying
I was thinking that a jet would work in a vacuum
but i guess not?
Idk
Eventually it would not have enough oxygen for injection so no
some very basics behind each
Sorry I was referring to a jet engine, not the whole jet.
just not enough stuff to push off of in a vacuum
rockets basically don't work in a vacuum
Why not there's nothing that stopping it
rockets use atmosphere to push off of
No
They don't
throwing gas into nothingness does nothing
Propellers use that
Rocket's are different from propellers
There's a difference between thrust and lift
rockets use propellent in the form of gas thrown out the back end to move forward
ignited gas
this prepellent needs an atmosphere to work to push off of something
otherwise its got no thrust
There's liquid and solid fuel as well
doesn't matter what type of fuel it is
its still propellant that propels the ship forward, and works well in an atmosphere
we can see it working
The amount of thrust can differ based on fuel
in a vacuum, not so much
similiar to a feather that doesn't move at all in a vacuum with a fan blowing on it
not one little bit
a rocket wouldn't move in a vacuum
There's a difference between a fan and a rocket
not when it comes to the medium
Rocket used to thrust to lift it upwards
same medium, same phenomenon
No
it uses atmosphere to create thrust
No it does not
That guy's a dumbass
K I'll watch it for you
with your own oxygen in the rocket fuel it is possible to get ignition, but it doesn't work that well
1,016,926 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 162/4068
| Next