Message from @Lemonier

Discord ID: 501639686905790474


2018-10-16 06:11:18 UTC  

one guy with a MSc > 100% of rocket physicists

2018-10-16 06:11:23 UTC  

just showed a disturbing portrait of a man

2018-10-16 06:11:45 UTC  

this guy has a master's degree in technical physics

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/484514023698726912/501638362004979722/unknown.png

2018-10-16 06:11:52 UTC  

let me see

2018-10-16 06:11:57 UTC  

he's telling you it has nothign to push off of, it won't work

2018-10-16 06:12:03 UTC  

and hes wrong

2018-10-16 06:12:16 UTC  

because he apparently doesnt understand rockets

2018-10-16 06:12:45 UTC  

well, the link is up above

2018-10-16 06:13:22 UTC  

lets read newtons third law by quote shall we?

2018-10-16 06:13:47 UTC  

For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction.

2018-10-16 06:13:47 UTC  

maybe we should watch this video and see if he address it

2018-10-16 06:13:56 UTC  

goopy

2018-10-16 06:14:00 UTC  

srry

2018-10-16 06:14:10 UTC  

so if I flap my arms in a vacuum, am I going anywhere?

2018-10-16 06:14:14 UTC  

nope

2018-10-16 06:14:24 UTC  

no medium to propel you up

2018-10-16 06:14:44 UTC  

if I take an oxygen tank in a vacuum and start releasing gas, am I going to move anywhere?

2018-10-16 06:15:27 UTC  

if you let the gas out at a very fast speed and a very high pressure, you're going to fall backwards from the force of the gas ejecting out the tank

2018-10-16 06:15:42 UTC  

if you let it drizzle out nope

2018-10-16 06:16:43 UTC  

nope, won't matter

2018-10-16 06:17:01 UTC  

have you tried it yourself or are you just saying so

2018-10-16 06:17:30 UTC  

you might get thrust but I don't think so, not significant amount

2018-10-16 06:18:04 UTC  

depending on how fast the oxygen comes out ya you might not get much, but you still get it

2018-10-16 06:18:06 UTC  

on the plus side any thrust would be better in a vacuum though

2018-10-16 06:18:16 UTC  

yes it would

2018-10-16 06:18:24 UTC  

because you don't need alot of thrust to move, unlike atmosphere

2018-10-16 06:18:39 UTC  

no air resistance

2018-10-16 06:18:41 UTC  

indeed

2018-10-16 06:20:06 UTC  

you still have the problem of pushing the amount of mass foward

2018-10-16 06:20:25 UTC  

in a vacuum with no air resistance would make it easier

2018-10-16 06:20:35 UTC  

true

2018-10-16 06:20:43 UTC  

but the rocket has to get there first

2018-10-16 06:20:56 UTC  

so it trudges on through the atmosphere

2018-10-16 06:21:15 UTC  

still amount of mass matters because it limits how much thrust you need to generate to move the entire mass, and stop it

2018-10-16 06:21:34 UTC  

the more mass the more thrust

2018-10-16 06:21:38 UTC  

suffice it to say that although it might function some, it wouldn't work enough to land on the moon and take off again, land back on earth

2018-10-16 06:21:59 UTC  

let me find a fun fact real quick

2018-10-16 06:22:32 UTC  

the more mass means the more thrust you need to move it

2018-10-16 06:22:35 UTC  

even in a vacuum

2018-10-16 06:22:36 UTC  

All Apollo missions carried and used around 5,625,000 pounds of propellant in all three modules and the Saturn V launch vehicle. This is for the whole trip, with the greatest amounts being used in the first minutes [to achieve orbital velocity] by the Saturn V rocket.

2018-10-16 06:22:50 UTC  

*thats a lot of propellant*