you might get thrust but I don't think so, not significant amount

depending on how fast the oxygen comes out ya you might not get much, but you still get it

on the plus side any thrust would be better in a vacuum though

yes it would

because you don't need alot of thrust to move, unlike atmosphere

no air resistance

indeed

you still have the problem of pushing the amount of mass foward

in a vacuum with no air resistance would make it easier

true

but the rocket has to get there first

so it trudges on through the atmosphere

still amount of mass matters because it limits how much thrust you need to generate to move the entire mass, and stop it

the more mass the more thrust

suffice it to say that although it might function some, it wouldn't work enough to land on the moon and take off again, land back on earth

let me find a fun fact real quick

the more mass means the more thrust you need to move it

even in a vacuum

All Apollo missions carried and used around 5,625,000 pounds of propellant in all three modules and the Saturn V launch vehicle. This is for the whole trip, with the greatest amounts being used in the first minutes [to achieve orbital velocity] by the Saturn V rocket.

*thats a lot of propellant*

you don't just have to propel the rocket, you also have to propel all that propellant itself

keep in mind i dont believe in space like the globe earth model says it is or that we went to the moon, im just saying if we were in the ge model it would be possible

the more you take the less opitmal it is

you heard about them losing all their trajectory records?

let me find how heavy the rocket is

3,039,000kg

sounds like fiction to me, 5 million lbs of propellant

yea, I don't beleive that

you know NASA is one of the biggest userse of helium

they put helium in all their sattelites, they are just big high tech balloons

helium is a great way to eject materials out faster and is used in rockets yes

cause outer space is a lie and a false myth

i wouldn't put it that harshly but ya

well, do you really think we landed on the moon on flat earth?

but can we agree if the rocket had over 5.6m pounds of fuel and weighed that much it could reach the said escape velocity?

nope

but if the ge model were true id say yes

no, I don't believe they had that much

do you think it could though if they did have that much?

what they had was enough fuel to crash the rocket into the ocean and pretend to land on the moon on a movie set

i think that too