@Rigg5 Couldst I please have Globe Earther and/or Undecided?

It said Truther, Mainstream, or Undecided. I chose Undecided.

Who here thinks the earth is flat?

Ok let me get this straight. I am a globe earther. I will choose Truther since I want the truth, although I do tend to accept mainstream things after looking at the facts.

hola

More than 20?

More than 200!

(If you take into account that every sovereign state has a government)

Oh well. I'm stuck with "Undecided Earth Model", even though FE doesn't even have an Earth model that works, so GE is the only option (and it's fact-based).

Could you pls fix my role?

I am a globe earther. I will choose Truther since I want the truth, although I do tend to accept mainstream things after looking at the facts.

@The Gwench The reason comets have a tail is because of "solar wind", a stream of charged particles being emitted constantly by the Sun. If you study comets when they appear, you'll find out that the direction of the tail is always away from the Sun, not in the direction the comet is moving. It is not because of motion, but because of dust and gases being "blown" off the comet.

Who are "they"?

So, astronomers between half a millennium and a century and a half ago?

?

Wut

oh

nvm

i slow

So why does CERN have to also be fake for the conspiracy to work?

Why is the amphitheater only used for !rank?

!rank

Oh I didn’t even read the channel description

Strange name tho

Sounds like it should be some sort of fight arena, like a debate but no holds barred sort of thing.

Wait no

That would be coliseum

Nvm

Right

I was thinking of coliseums

Ye

What about southern stars? Using a telescope, you can see that the Southern Celestial Pole never moves. And this same point in the sky is seen by all people in the southern hemisphere. But on the FE "model", "south" is in all different directions. Explain?

So everything south of the Equator is fake?

Even when they look south?

So they look in the opposite direction and see the same thing?

Ok. But observable evidence says they rotate around two points.

One observer in the north sees them rotating around Polaris while looking northwards. The other observer is in the south and sees them rotating around Sigma Octantis (approximately) while looking southwards.

So, two points.

On opposite ends of the sky.

But it's on the opposite side of the sky

And its always south, which the FE map says is a different direction depending upon where you are. So Sigma Octantis/Polaris is in a completely different location depending upon where you are?

Why the south? Why not the north?

Well the sun is always the same distance away from the observer, since it never appears to change size.

Or they haven't because, just maybe, it's really cold?

How do you know they haven't?

Do you understand how light angles work?

Wait so the Earth is flat, therefore north-south circumnavigation is impossible, therefore nobody's done it, therefore the Earth is flat?

Or what's your real reason for thinking all the people who say they have are lying?

Source?

Source?

Could somebody who thinks the Earth is flat attempt to refute this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transglobe_Expedition

http://transglobe-expedition.org/

https://www.upi.com/Archives/1981/05/21/Transglobe-expedition-makes-it-to-LA/9373359265600/

https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/polar-record/article/polar-aspects-of-the-transglobe-expedition/CFBFCC9E2CAB0FBCA2F7E16240522BEF

Yey

So if yer gonna die when you have the baby, screw you! You’re fucked!

(Sarcasm, in case you can tell)

Bcuz muh holey buk

I’ve got mainstream and globe earther, idk what else I need.

I don’t believe in really any of those conspiracies.

Area 51 is a super-deep borehole where the government has found a thousand mile thick layer of jelly, proving the earth is a donut. Besides that, no.

One

Ooh look it’s the all-powerful “they” again

It’s bad

Not good

I haven’t actually researched it really at all so I can’t say much more than that

Alright. But it would be helpful if you could specify which organization(s) you are referring to, instead of using the blanket term “they” or “them”.

Ok

Sorry

4 bans from 24/7. I think that’s a record! I’m good at pissing people off, huh. This time, all I did was talk about parallax a bit.

waow

waow

The caps rule: The more capital letters you have in your title, the higher your credibility. Legitness.

Oh can I have questioning as well?

The reason you should “believe” the round earth is that there is a heck ton of empirical evidence for it.

?

@Kitty if you take different pictures from different angles, different distances, different times, as different spectrums of light, yes, the pictures will look different.

@Citizen Z Care to back up that claim about the flood?

And those aren’t from the iss

*Can* do. How do you know they are?

Where/when/what context has NASA said they are fake?

Mm no. It’s just following the curve of the earth into orbit.

If it actually came back down in the ocean, you’d see at least a very thin trail.

But when the trail becomes too small to see it is still nearly horizontal.

@Citizen Z You need at least three non-collinear. The four that sigma was referring to are in a square or quadrilateral, not all on the same line.

It is real

When I have directly seen it from the ground twice, and thousands and thousands have seen it through a telescope as a space station and not a plane or something, I’m pretty sure it’s real.

Also you can’t bounce radar off of holographs, but you can on the ISS.

Indeed.

Some say universal acceleration

(The disk accelerating constantly upwards through infinite space at 9.8 meters per second per second)

Exactly, anomalies don’t work.

But they do make sense on the GE

Indoctrination camps lol

Lol

Obviously

Ok, what was the experience?

What context? What were you been doing then?

What does the SS have to do with possible spiritual experiences?