lounge
Discord ID: 484514023698726912
1,016,926 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 1411/4068
| Next
good to see you around again
much love @^Kevin^
<:heart1:507994140408152066>
Like while I might not agree on flat earth, anti vaccine, or biblical literalism but the musics alright
tyrone
join group
chat
im also the House DJ <:cool:507986727953235970>
giggle
so what have you been up to @โงMike Flatbird (Mike Blackbird)โง ?
Chillin
-n you?! ๐
spent alot of time trying to ~~spend~~ spread flat earth truth on discord
eYe be spreading it 2 <:cool:507986727953235970>
_much love_
flat smacking
funny. i spend my time disproving flat earth
so had some globe believer talking about flat smacking and I was like your using it wrong
>>wack ๐ ๐ ...
do you care about the truth Bruh?
_smackin'em around_ ...
what truth? globe?
do you actually care about the truth about whether the shape is flat or sphere?
Waste of time I'd say
shut it dude
not a waste of time, important
404 Error. Globe not found.
No need to talk about all of these subjects about the earth
Just one
important stuff
๐ฅ
Invalid arguments provided: User "globe" not found
so you don't listen to one side of the story and jump to conclusions, that makes you believe foolish things
Who?
ive listened to both sides. plenty
๐ฝ๐๐ธ๐ o==[]::::::::::::::::>๐ ๐จ
you should do enough researchto build a valid flat earth model and then compare the two models
oh ive done enough reasearch and analysis
dude, if you didn't set aside your globe beliefs first your research was skewed
you ever watch a movie and think before you even watch the movie that its going to suck?
@Citizen Z @Human Sheeple @^Kevin^ @Bibleman @JDoeghtery
Good evening. ๐
i compare both using scientific evidence
i don't particularly care if the earth is flat or not- to me, it doesn't change anything. but if it does for you, and you're passionate about it, i don't see why you shouldn't talk about it. as long as you're not hurting anyone, it's fine. just don't be rude, i guess
mathematical calculations, and generalizations
Hey
how much are you going to enjoy a movie when your already thinking its going to suck before you see it
hello
hello @The Gwench
@The Gwench hey there
honestly i thought venom woulda been awful but i watched it and i loved it idk
we measure a flat earth, miles squared * 7.98 inches per mile
10 miles is 66.6 feet of supposed curve that doesn't happen
but maybe that doesn't go for everything bc i hated captain marvel
yo eva
yo kevin
the point of the movies is your supposed to suspend disbelief so you don't nitpick the movie and point out all the obvious flaws in the movie - movie will be less enjoyable
ig so
im not too much of an expert on the curvature. more on the "fake space" aspect of globe earth, along with the existence of gravity
and if you want an unskewed perspective, you don't take biases into your research for the truth
the flat earth model would not be able to exist with gravity
about gravity @๐ ฑruh Sound Effect 2 what replaces it
who says gravity is real dude?
Alright, @Kessler Syndrome has been warned for '**Bad word usage**'.
see what I'm talking about taking your globe garbage into the flat earth model
we've had many calculations. we've detected gravitational waves
i just didn't like carol but i was biased when i started the movie
sometimes biases don't effect me but i think maybe it did with captain marvel
you really believe that garbage?
we didn't detect anything
@The Gwench hey
my bad i thought u were a flaterther @๐ ฑruh Sound Effect 2 lol
๐
we had someone putting noise over a mic and they used that to claim it was gravitational waves
newton even took his evidence of gravity and discovered the planet neptune because of the way uranus traveled
@^Kevin^ ok well id agree thats not very good evidence
can any flat earther explain the accelerating force than makes things more dense than the medium around in go donward?
in 2016 LIGO is a joke, you don't hear gravitational waves, gravity doesn't exist and asserting that you heard something doesn't prove it was gravity waves
you hear an effect, they didn't prove the noise was gravity waves
your speaking garbage dude
just because you dont "hear" gravitational waves doesnt mean they dont exist
@The Gwench ๐๐ป
dude, that is what they said was their proof, they heard it
Lol
your clueless
hello gwench
is your name like gwen and grinch put together
fuk. messed up
No. Gwen and wench put together. ๐
you hear gravitational waves differently than conventional waves
o ok
have you looked into einsteins work? general relativity?
don't say stupid stuff
ouch a gravity wave hit me
That faint rising tone, physicists say, is the first direct evidence of gravitational waves, the ripples in the fabric of space-time that Einstein predicted a century ago. (Listen to it here.) It completes his vision of a universe in which space and time are interwoven and dynamic, able to stretch, shrink and jiggle. And it is a ringing confirmation of the nature of black holes, the bottomless gravitational pits from which not even light can escape, which were the most foreboding (and unwelcome) part of his theory.
oo that thumbnail is pretty
they heard it
anyone promoting that gravity is real and was proven is an idiot and a moron
?any flat earther wiling to answer my question
so tell me you believe that gravity was proven and you will prove to me that you are a moron
hearing a sound doesn't prove gravity
sound doesn't travel in a vacuum
hahahah lol
thats not how they found it out
according to the HELLocentric model, outter space is in a vacuum, where sound doesn't travel
i take it you didnt read the findings kevin
just complete garbage, and that is what the HELLocentric model is pushing
@JDoeghtery orbits are a foward momentum AND gravity
dude, space isn't real
um yeah right
your entire model is garbage
rockets don't work in space
let's see you do it
no one has ever went to the moon
you can look for curvature and find none
kevin answer me a question about flat eath model please im questioning
what do you mean rockets dont work in space?
I read the findings, they think they heard gravitational waves and I linked the noise they heard
are you denying that I linked this and the article
@^Kevin^ you sound like a troll how
no im saying maybe you didnt read it
!mute @Hamburger Guy
Hamburger Guy#8249 (554102233319473152) is now muted for '**Unspecified.**', alright? <:THUMBSUP6:403560443345371137>
and the gravitational waves. it wasnt the sound travelling through space. it was the vibration
dude, do you understand that sound doesn't travel thru a vacuum?
sound does not travel through a vacuum
doesnt space not have any gravity???
you need gas to carry sound
sound is gas vibrating
sound wave causing gas to vibrate
to carry it
gravity isn't real
you dont need gasses to carry sound. it works for solids as long as their are particles
we know for certain that things fall and rise
and how do you explain that force?
to say that gravity is the cause for why things fall is also unproven, as the fact that it exists at all
gravity is poorly defined
and by implying that gravity does not exist disproves space itself
These weren't sound waves.....
look, you don't have black holes either, they are just theories
Radio waves produce sound, that doesn't mean radio waves *are sound*
no one has ever seen a black hole
you look at CGi and think its real
do you know what a scientific theory is haha
aw black holes arent real
but theyre so pretty
do you know the difference between proof and garbage?
a theory is something that can be repeated and tested to be proved
you have garbage and try to pretend its proof
black holes have been proved. we can see the shadow of the black hole. this is because the intense gravitational field created distorts the space-time fabric, causing the light to warp around the blakc hole.
no, black holes are science fiction, never proven and absolutely proven false
space is fake, obviously science fiction, so black holes are also part of that fakeness
@^Kevin^ Tell me what is the accelerating force causing denser objects to be pulled to the ground past less dense objects pleease?
how do you explain absorption and emmision lines on spectrographs if space is fake?
density and bouyancy describes why things rise or fall, if things are heavier than the medium they are in they fall, if they are lighter than the medium they are in, they rise.
these are lines in between the visible spectrum when graphed, and show the different photons absorbed by different elements. we can use this analysis to find out the composition of things like the sun
wait if space is fake then what's the sky and stars and stuff
density = weight / volume
i didnt ask that @^Kevin^ i asked what the accelerating force is in bouyancy
bouyancy = p x V x g
mass has no gravity attached to it, mass = weight without gravity
So bouyancy can be downwards?
im asking what the accelerating force is
bouyancy describes why things rise
density = mass // volume
density is mass/volume. not weight/volume
density = weight divided by volume
no
mass
bouyancy = density x volume x gravity ( p x V x g )
mass = weight
so replace gravity
no
.
where do stars come from kevin?? (real question not troll promise)
he cant explain
bouyancy doesn't need any gravity attached to it
so replace gravity
@Kฯshoโข Hey Kosho ๐
you try to put math with gravity in everything, its unneeded
for buoyancy to work you need a fluid
hello, gwench
tell me what to type into my calculator @^Kevin^
to calculate bouyancy
that does not explain the gravitational pull from objects in outer space
defintiion of bouyancy has no gravity in it
Riddle me this: why is downwards acceleration independent of density? Why doesn't metal fall faster than wood?
and tell me the accelerating force in bouyancy
clearly, you do not understand buoyancy
when you put a basketball in an empty pool, it goes to the botom
slowly add water, describe what happens to the ball
it rises
mass in the definition has no gravity in it
it does a float
mans showing definitions of mass?
thankyou
Of course mass doesn't have g in the definition.
it becomes isplaced by the water, which is being compelled downward
you don't need to include gravity in any definition with mass
gravity is unneeded
without the waters compulsion in the downward direction, the ball would have no need to rise
so flat earth model describe why things rise or falls
wrong. gravity is not "unneeded" we use gravity for weight
Fun
weight is a force, an mass is a property of matter
i was 3 years into my mechanical physics degree and just found mass, please @^Kevin^ what causes the downward accelerating force in masses that are denser than air, and buoyancy also requires a downward accelerating force.
Saying gravity is unnecessary or unneeded is ignorant
the flawed HELLocentric model that doesn't work tries to use gravity even though its poorly defined and no one knows what it actually is, is some "force" that causes things to fall, but its too weak to affect a magnet from pulling up a paper clip yet supposed to have huge masses moving around other huge masses, yet its too weak. you are picking and choosing when and when it doesn't work
Just because it goes with flat earth
poorly defined?
Buoyancy is a force that a fluid exerts on any object placed inside of it. On Earth, we have Archimedes' principle, which states that the buoyant force is equal to the weight of the fluid that the object displaced. In zero gravity, the fluid has no weight, so there's no buoyancy!https://howthingsfly.si.edu/ask-an-explainer/can-liquid-exert-buoyancy-force-object-immersed-it-zero-gravity
if its a force that can push the moon around the earht, then it should be strong enough to keep things from flying like birds
cmon kevin
poorly defined
it doesnt push the moon around the earth
give me a definition of gravity
poorly understood
well defined
besides bogus theory
kevinnnn space doesn't exist right
then please please please tell me where you think stars come from im actually curious
because that is my definition of gravity - its a bogus theory that doesn't work
gravity is a weak force in the universe @^Kevin^ it has an inverse square law which reduces its effect the further away from the centre
Lol
gravity is the bend in space time, and can also be defined as the force propagating from a gravitational source in all directions at the speed of light
Space-time grips mass, telling it how to move. Mass grips space-time, telling it how to curve.
thats gravity
okay, so why is things rising?
because gravity is weak?
bouyancy
You do realise the gravitational force depends on the object, right?
gravity is weak. yes
things being displaced
just like the basketball
bouyancy is part of flat earth model, not HELLocentric model
whahaha
no
cmon
Buoyancy isn't a part of any "model". It just is.
it is caused by the uneven distribution of mass, therefore creating this curvature in space time
dude, that is just stupid
buoyancy describes the effect of an accelerating force on objects with different densities, the accerlating force in our model is gravity, tell me your force please
thats how its described
both newton's and einstien's versions of gravity is just not true
andd evidence conforms with it
in physics, gravity is on the four fundamental forces, and is also the weakest
@^Kevin^ what are stars??? if space doesnt exist?? where do stars come from? fr curious pls
its one of the most succesful theories in science
mass doesn't attract mass without magnetism or static electricity with water
@^Kevin^ newton proved gravity and calculated the existence of neptune based on the orbit of uranus
1,016,926 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 1411/4068
| Next