but yes it is an interesting possibility

yeah lets just ignore the satellites in space

Ze worldo from JoJo's Bizarre Adventure

yeah since there aren't any in space... they are all on balloons and are in the atmosphere

It definitely explains the Yuga Cycles very well.

@Human Sheeple

!rank

Baguette._.Boi, this command is disabled in this channel. <:SMILESWEAT6:403540174069432320>

and btw you cant manipulate gravity i think its constant force

RIP

you can't manipulate gravity, because gravity does not exist

you can manipulate other things though

actually it does and it can be proven in a variety of ways

prove r

prove gravity as a cause of things falling to the ground

I will wait

but not hold my breath

lol

for the sake of this argument i would bring in black holes because youll just say they dont exist

No manipulation, no cause and effect, no experiment, no proof

Gravity is a fraudulent thief.
Much like a rival doctor who jealously steals another doctors work and passes it off as it's own.
Gravity stole the work of dielectric and electromagnetic properties.

prove circumference of the ground / all the oceans

document it

with witnesses

How would people explain how you are able to see the iss through a telescope?
Is that really fake when you can do it yourself??

and video footage

wanna see a real picture of the whole thing

😄

@Tejiu The Gecko You mean this?

This is what you see

Is this rotating?

a photograph that is non-composite

once you have provided all of these things, then I will consider

There is a ton of videos of people film the iss through a telescope you can do it yourself

but not before

@Tejiu The Gecko Is that pokeball rotating?

looks can be deceiving

yeah ive seen the iss myself through my friends telescope

uh

@eletrick33 Is that pokeball rotating?

Not truly because it is pixels and pixels are 2d space

i think so

@Tejiu The Gecko Correct

You also see this through a telescope

Why is that?

If it was a 3d then yes it would rotate

wait thats not pluto last time i checked we dont have a picture that clear of it

but whatever

Because you need 2 eyes and 2 separate angles to determine a third dimension.

Maybe I should test if my telescope can see satellites clear to prove it

But it is not the best

Iss was not sent up in one piece

yeah theres a thing called a telescope

ask the Vatican to use one of their telescopes

XD

Even without a telescope, you can see satellites in low orbit catching the sun shortly after sunset on any clear, dark night with good viewing. ... Now if you mean whycan't we see probes in lunar orbit, they are far too small and far too far away.

@Tejiu The Gecko Because you need 2 eyes and 2 separate angles to determine a third dimension. If you use a telescope, you're only using one eye and cannot determine anything in the sky to be three dimensional.

you can get an iss tracker on your phone

see what they tell you

@eletrick33

ye

Meant to tag you in my comment above

oh

wait wait wait wait

You need both eyes for three dimensions @eletrick33

no you dont

Yes you do

Optics 101

close one of your eyes and tell me how everything looks

167. Satellite Substitutions:
High Altitude Airships
High Altitude Platforms
Lighter than Air Vehicles
High Altitude Long Endurance
High Altitude Long Operation
StratSat
Airborne Relay Communication
HeliPlat & HeliNet System
High Altitude Shuttle System
Small Balloon Systems
Nano Balloon Systems
Google Loon System
Stratospheric Platform Systems
High Altitude Long Endurance Demonstrator

@Citizen Z https://tenor.com/view/tie-fighter-star-wars-animated-gif-11030692

@eletrick33 Your brain is doing the rest of the work because you already know some things to be 3 dimensional.

😂

You can get telescope with double lense

And others that determent distance and such

But those are pretty expensive

also im pretty sure were in the 4th dimension be i believe according to string theory the 4th dimension is time

also that quora but i guess ill take it

I don't buy that, because that would break causality, if cauasality is broken so then is scientific method

If you can move in the 3 spacial dimensions you should be able to move in the time dimension too

But do 3d dimension even matter if you see the iss in space through a telescope?
It is there if you can see it no matter the distance

So I go back in time to 1912, I prevent the titanic from ever sinking, I stop the federal reserve act, I prevent World War 1, Hitler became a painter, the third reich never formed, ww2 never happened, my Grandparents never got together, I cease to be.

Because I cease to be I cannot have gone back in time to prevent the Titanic from sinking

How, exactly, are you expecting to see a football field over 400 miles up when you can only see a dot when planes fly overhead at a measly 35,000 feet? Or 6 miles?

Please explain the logic.

@🍄The Mad Philosopher🍄 gravity

Angular resolution and diffraction don't work that way...

@Human Sheeple you going back in time to kill yourself would cause a paradox because if you kill yourself as a baby wouldnt be their to kill yourself so it creates a paradox of sorts i guess

Yeah but my grandparents got together because of the events of WW2, if WW2 they probaby would have never have met

yeah causing them to not meet would also cause the same paradox

Unless you believe in infinite timelines theorem, where you have altered that timeline's history but your own timeline remains unaltered

yeah i have heard of that

but im not sure how true it is

I mean sure you could always pay a bunch of actors in costumes and make some really old props and pretend you're back in time