@!GPT are u gay?

You hit on people, often?

ur mom gay

No u

so GPT explained about buoyancy and things, and it makes sense. but why do things fall at 9.8 in a vacuum but not 12? @Human Sheeple

or 14

etc

@ibyghee Perfect vacuum's never been observed and they don't

Hmmmmmmmmm

but why do things fall at this rate?

Oh I know

I need hmmmmmmmmm pics

Brb

@Human Sheeple why do things fall at 9.8 even in a vacuum which aint really a vacuum

https://youtu.be/2hBDTh1PUK0

@ibyghee They don't

but even in a vacuum its nearly 9.8

like a vacuum that has little particles

And no such thing as a perfect vacuum

ik i just agreed

but even in a vacuum

mathmatically

it would fall at 9.8

@Human Sheeple so rockets can still work in a 'vacuum' b/c there's no perfect vacuum

since in a vacuum which is not really a vacuum

like it has little air

it falls close to 9.8

@BurDur NO THEY FUCKING DON'T

THE RAPID MOTION AND COLLISIONS OF MOLECULES WITH THE WALLS OF THE CONTAINER "CAUSES" GAS PRESSURE: https://imgur.com/a/IoZI0kk

maybe not exactly 9.8

@Human Sheeple lol ya they do

@BurDur Stupid mouth breathing knucklehead

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zyq5eN9C4Cc

>>mute @BurDur

<:vSuccess:390202497827864597> Successfully muted **BurDur**#6790

Get shown they don't then go oh yes they do even having seen they don't, that is called LYING

I fucking hate liars

@Human Sheeple lemme try explain my question better. so you said no vacuum is perfect. Which is 100% true. But mathematically even in a vacuum it falls at 9.81

mathematically using your globe earth fairy tale math that's shown to be wrong because the video I posted shows they don't accelerate at the same rate WATCH THE VIDEO https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2hBDTh1PUK0 @ibyghee

ye I told you I agree @Human Sheeple

there is no perfect vacuum

so you agree they are not falling at the same rate?

Ok my hmmmmmmmmm pics are ready

because it aint a perfect vacuum

So why are you asserting this rate of acceleration that obviously IS NOT THE CASE

so it has little difference

becuase mathmetically

in a perfect vacuum

its 9.81

such amazing stars

math in a perfect vacuum you're assuming again you've never seen a perfect vacuum nobody has

so you're saying 1+1 is not 2?

its maths

not laws or theories

Alright someone needs to unmute this wamen

this is simple maths

obviously people wouldn’t accelerate at the same rate if air resistance was present. If there was no air resistance they would land at exactly the same time

Alright, @♡♡cute but psycho♡♡ has been warned for '**Capital letters**'.

exactly

thanks @Dys

Respec must be shown

that was what I was saying, In a perfect vacuum, things fall at 9.81

and in a unperfect vacuum they fall at 9.8

no

wait im wrong

they fall at 9.81 but because of bouyancy they have difference

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=E43-CfukEgs

so again you are playing with number 2 then 2. CHANGING THE DENSITY OF THE MEDIUM: https://imgur.com/a/oif0VPU

@Human Sheeple whats number 2?

are you talking to me?

2. CHANGING THE DENSITY OF THE MEDIUM: https://imgur.com/a/oif0VPU

@Human Sheeple what does that proove?

a feather would fall slower because it has a large surface area to volume ratio

I'm throwing gravity away, I am showign you 10 cause and effect mechanisms you can "probably" do yourself to manipulate freefall objects acceleration that you have been brainwashed to IGNORE

but in a vacuum they fall close toghther

Or Ohh that's only for aerospace engineers

wait

explain better

you aint making sense

NEWSFLASH, aerospace engineers model the Earth as FLAT and NON ROTATING

you aint explaining why in a mathmetical vacuum, thngs fall at 9.81

if you say thats fake, you are goign against 1=1=2

fuck

1+1=2

Bitch lasagna

Alright, @♡♡cute but psycho♡♡ has been warned for '**Capital letters**'.

Unmute me you melts

@♡♡cute but psycho♡♡ sure thing bb

I am a hot English trash bag (;

You know it b

Why are we muted tho fr

Is it because we don't support the fatties

Oh