>>mute @BurDur

<:vSuccess:390202497827864597> Successfully muted **BurDur**#6790

Get shown they don't then go oh yes they do even having seen they don't, that is called LYING

I fucking hate liars

@Human Sheeple lemme try explain my question better. so you said no vacuum is perfect. Which is 100% true. But mathematically even in a vacuum it falls at 9.81

mathematically using your globe earth fairy tale math that's shown to be wrong because the video I posted shows they don't accelerate at the same rate WATCH THE VIDEO https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2hBDTh1PUK0 @ibyghee

ye I told you I agree @Human Sheeple

there is no perfect vacuum

so you agree they are not falling at the same rate?

Ok my hmmmmmmmmm pics are ready

because it aint a perfect vacuum

So why are you asserting this rate of acceleration that obviously IS NOT THE CASE

so it has little difference

becuase mathmetically

in a perfect vacuum

its 9.81

such amazing stars

math in a perfect vacuum you're assuming again you've never seen a perfect vacuum nobody has

so you're saying 1+1 is not 2?

its maths

not laws or theories

Alright someone needs to unmute this wamen

this is simple maths

obviously people wouldn’t accelerate at the same rate if air resistance was present. If there was no air resistance they would land at exactly the same time

Alright, @♡♡cute but psycho♡♡ has been warned for '**Capital letters**'.

exactly

thanks @Dys

Respec must be shown

that was what I was saying, In a perfect vacuum, things fall at 9.81

and in a unperfect vacuum they fall at 9.8

no

wait im wrong

they fall at 9.81 but because of bouyancy they have difference

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=E43-CfukEgs

so again you are playing with number 2 then 2. CHANGING THE DENSITY OF THE MEDIUM: https://imgur.com/a/oif0VPU

@Human Sheeple whats number 2?

are you talking to me?

2. CHANGING THE DENSITY OF THE MEDIUM: https://imgur.com/a/oif0VPU