And no such thing as a perfect vacuum

ik i just agreed

but even in a vacuum

mathmatically

it would fall at 9.8

@Human Sheeple so rockets can still work in a 'vacuum' b/c there's no perfect vacuum

since in a vacuum which is not really a vacuum

like it has little air

it falls close to 9.8

@BurDur NO THEY FUCKING DON'T

THE RAPID MOTION AND COLLISIONS OF MOLECULES WITH THE WALLS OF THE CONTAINER "CAUSES" GAS PRESSURE: https://imgur.com/a/IoZI0kk

maybe not exactly 9.8

@Human Sheeple lol ya they do

@BurDur Stupid mouth breathing knucklehead

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zyq5eN9C4Cc

>>mute @BurDur

<:vSuccess:390202497827864597> Successfully muted **BurDur**#6790

Get shown they don't then go oh yes they do even having seen they don't, that is called LYING

I fucking hate liars

@Human Sheeple lemme try explain my question better. so you said no vacuum is perfect. Which is 100% true. But mathematically even in a vacuum it falls at 9.81

mathematically using your globe earth fairy tale math that's shown to be wrong because the video I posted shows they don't accelerate at the same rate WATCH THE VIDEO https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2hBDTh1PUK0 @ibyghee

ye I told you I agree @Human Sheeple

there is no perfect vacuum

so you agree they are not falling at the same rate?

Ok my hmmmmmmmmm pics are ready

because it aint a perfect vacuum

So why are you asserting this rate of acceleration that obviously IS NOT THE CASE

so it has little difference

becuase mathmetically

in a perfect vacuum

its 9.81

such amazing stars

math in a perfect vacuum you're assuming again you've never seen a perfect vacuum nobody has

so you're saying 1+1 is not 2?

its maths

not laws or theories

Alright someone needs to unmute this wamen

this is simple maths