0

im a flat earther now

Electric lighting

@HockeyPockey zealotard

I can Google it. -DERP

@Citizen Z how do you explain the Cavendish results if gravitational nforce doesn't exist

HERPY DERP

Actually that’s a good question

@BurDur I've never seen a Cavendish experiment prove shit and ive seen about 100 of them

Nonsense

I usually see people tell why Cavendish is illegitimate, like the above

It shows the gravity force

No it doesn't

But what is the actual FE position on what Cavendish “means”?

You can repeat it

doesn't prove anything

Fine then fecore test proves nothing

Same logic

huge lead balls are wire spinning... proves nothing

I can write things off just like you

Dum

Which Cavendish experiment can you provide that eliminates all variables? @BurDur

Doesn’t prove anything isn’t really a position.

The first one did

And Paul Heyl and all the others since then

Like, what do you think caused the results?

I guess that’s better wording

Cavendish was not a true experiment.

Sure it was

So, wind? Electricity?

🤔

Cavendish was an awesome experiment

Followed scientific method

!mute @HockeyPockey

HockeyPockey#3209 (553102909957472277) is now muted for '**Unspecified.**', alright? <:THUMBSUP6:403560443345371137>

Kek

>>voicekick @HockeyPockey

`!voicekick` Perhaps?

This isn’t fair

!voicekick @HockeyPockey

Or does Vortex do the kicking?

🤔

He shouldn’t be banned

7 levels away from Gold, sheesh.

Wait, Citizen, what level are you at?

CURVATURE ZERO PROOF WITH SCIENTIFIC METHOD:
You're observing ships going over the horizon, you have your
Main Hypothesis
If the earth is a sphere, then ships travelling away from you will eventually disappear from view hull first


You are now flipping it around with a
Null Hypothesis
If the earth is a sphere, then ships travellign away from you WILL NOT eventually disapepar from view hull first


You are putting the cart before the horse, the dependent variable, the EFFECT :
Ships disapepar from view hull first

Your independent variable that you have to manipulate, the CAUSE:
Spherical earth

In order to reject/falsify the null hypothesis you MUST be able to physically manipulate the independent variable
Can you or anyone manipulate the Earth?
Meanwhile your NULL HYPOTHESIS can be falsified very easily with refraction, optical slant, convergence and angular resolution:

FLAT EARTH TORONTO BOTTOM UP OCCULTATION WITH REFRACTION: https://imgur.com/a/mpMigsS
FLAT EARTH CHICAGO BOTTOM UP OCCULTATION WITH REFRACTION: https://imgur.com/a/yx7PFD1
FLAT EARTH CONVERGENCE WALK: https://imgur.com/a/U0XUoJ2

Do you see the problem here? Your null hypothesis of "I can see ships disappearing hull first over the horizon, the Earth must be a sphere"
You are preaching an invalid scientific inquiry, a non sequitur fallacy and pseudoscience all at the same time.

@Human Sheeple oh stop your cut and paste QE. The independent variable was the mass and distance, which caused a change in torque on the torsion balance

Null hypothesis is no correlation to mass and change in torque

Easy stuff

@BurDur How did you eliminate CHARGE from an ELEVATED METAL object acting like and ANTENNA to show the observations were NOT due to COULOMB FORCE?

https://images-ext-1.discordapp.net/external/UtqtnkMkpxGfCaEcSnD2xY09pSGqGk-atWln8RP1ogg/https/cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/454328933626806283/476083743338266624/Sequence_01_23.gif

@Human Sheeple easy it was grounded uniform charge throughout

Show me cavendish with 4 volt meters set to the lowest setting to show there is ZERO NET VOLTAGE

@BurDur IT IS DANGLING IN MID AIR THAT IS NOT GROUNDED

The structure is supported by the ground

https://youtu.be/do4IO_U3B5o

And stray charge would give random result not consistent attractive force

@BurDur Prove that ```any stray chrage would give a random result```

https://images-ext-2.discordapp.net/external/8G5ihMwZFEf6Mf7ILouqLZJB1-3lV3oo6ptLVOoBVnw/https/cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/419246750260264960/479900736935690260/Photoelectric.gif

Lol free energy video in YouTube is believable

Yep, solar panel and a motor

But Livestream from space is fake

"free energy"

Look no batteries or capacitors

@Charlie'sAngel needs to be muted for spamming the #ArtGallery - thx @Citizen Z

Somebody has been drinking too much BIG OIL

Coulomb force can be both repulsive and attractive depending on the charge

@Citizen Z can I get my previlages (sp) back

Lol

https://images-ext-2.discordapp.net/external/CMgpVadBpUv02N0VwJdCLyWXgnCruzinoGSFJz1YjGc/https/cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/419030767356739594/479026570413998080/Cavendish.gif
What like this you mean @BurDur 😂

HA HA HA HA HA HA

That's not a Cavendish experiment

Yes it is

Looool

Taken from Sly Sparkane

Globers are great at giving Flat Earth Ammunition

They debunk themselves

Ok so if I set up a laser shooting at the sky and say see, it's not flat, is that the same as the fecore experiment?

Oh WOW lasers curve UP

Fake cgi

Peer reviewed scientific evidence @BurDur

Lol don't pretend you understand that math

Gravity is all peer reviewed science too

Uncertainty of .15%

In the gravitational constant

i love you citizen

U debunked yourself

"It is obvious that the effect of temperature variation is decisive over the
other atmospheric factors on refraction, to the following proportions: Tempera
ture to humidity to carbon dioxide content to air preEsure = 100 : 6 : 2 : 1 "

INVESTIGATION OF REFRACTION
IN THE LOW ATMOSPHERE
By
K. HORV_,.TH
Department of Survey. Technical university. Budapest
(Received Alay 29, 1969)
Presented by Ass. Prof. Dr. F. SAHKOZY

(nohomo)

@Human Sheeple oh ok cool so refraction is a thing

Warm air closest to the ground or warm air highest up?

https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/484514023698726912/556182067289784330/FlatEarthRefractionUp5.png?width=400&height=250

gravity is fake right?

Explains the fecore laser thing then

yes it is

Light will bend to the colder denser gas or hte warmer less dense gas?

Colder air above, light bends up