#newsroom (Discord ID: 398858182455459853) in Subverse, page 335
Security Advisory: Links in messages may lead to maliciously operated websites that could track your IP address and reveal your identity, or they may contain harmful files. The DiscordLeaks team does not check links and cannot make any statements about the safety of following these links.
Some ways to protect yourself are:
- Do not open files downloaded from links, and do not run any programs that try to download themselves to your computer.
- Use anonymization measures such as Tor Browser or a VPN.
If you are using the Privacy Badger or other privacy extensions, you may need to whitelist Discord and related domains in order for the images to load.
bAsH ThE faSh
Personally, I keep a flail in my car. Study HEMA so i'm good with a lot of simple things like pipes as well if it comes down to it. I should get a bikelock really.
The trick that Eric didn't seem to get about using a bike lock as an improvised weapon is that if you twist your wrist at the last second, you can really amplify the force.
If you force it to swing.
Exactly, same method with maces.
Reason why blunt objects with such handles are very dangerous when striking the top of the head.
The great thing is, nobody looks at you twice if you've got a bike lock in the city.
Also why people stopped using flat helmets in medieval times.
Also Chin Reveal.
>hair visible near chin
is this another failed f76 merch ?
Bruh. I already said I worked as a bike courier.
it looks plastic to me 😃
And no, that's a Chrome messenger bag. My old one. My newer one wasn't within reach like my Old reliable bike lock is.
Cross posting from debate....
Tims getting bludgeoned in the comments on his video for the GoFundMe wall campaign, mostly for citing Buzzfeed. All I've read are uncompelling stances against buzzfeed as whole, or stating the alternative non-profit intriduction doesn't qualify as grounds for modifying the original campaign terms. No one seems to want to engage any other substantive details.
thats because it's Buzzfeed
i.e. the terms state that a goal of $1bn has to be met to secure all donors contributions be petitioned for actual border efforts. It's still only at $20mn, way short of any campaign goal that would distribute any portion anywhere else other than the GoFundMe holding position
All of the instances addressed in the buzzfeed article are sound and valid in and ofthemselves, though...,
Gay Purge in Chechnya
Can Tim, on any topic, produce coverage along with his arguement that captures the fact pattern in its required scope and scale, rather than relying on ommission of details so as to substantiate his position? I mean come on bro, one upload after another the past several months have failed on this front
you mean less videos but better quality?
Though I'm totally for something new/different.
like every once in a while some "tech news", if there is something he likes to talk about
Theres some potential in progressing his presentation, but the method of trim down the information being presented so as to not interfere with the conclusion at the end, effectively restricting factual details
Just watched the 'russia narrative falls apart again' spot he put up
Maybe he should try to pull a styx every once in a while?
or a bit Mehdi Sadaghdar
And the title reflects his sentiment and conclusion, whixh are both in part dependent on his presentation of the figures so far found culpable in relation to the campaign / president
He should approach the matter by steel manning the arguement hes competing against
But hes consistently arguing against incomplete and or the weaker arguements
tim is kinda doing what he can aford to do right now, he talks about doing more but i and others assume he isint ready yet. a year or 2 ago he did a lot more on the ground coverage but i dont know what the finacial differences are now and then
For sure, we will all have some constraints. But my criticism is more directly trusted towards his model of rhetoric.
whats his rhetoric?
Lay the premise of the matter to favor his conclusion, often by trim away details that are not favorable to his conclusion
In the russia narrative video from today
tim has conclusions?
His conclusion is that the activity and pursuit of the matters are unwarranted and is a device being wielded by those who need a narrative to weaponize against the president
i think you might be getting tim and sargon confused, they have very similar formats but the difference is that tim though he shares his opinion doesent hold that as being whats important in his videos. he really only hits hard on his opinion when hes frustrated (usually with storys hes covered for a while that he thinks should be over) or the premise is rediculuous
And cites the prosecutions up to now as one area to consider, asserting that the violations on their part are not russia related stuff, like money laundering
tims opinion on the russia case has been building up over like 50 videos hes done on it for the last 3 years
what you see in his last video is basicly the colmination of him formulating his opinion based on so many events that have occured in the trump/russia story over that time
so citation needed would be like a 2 hour long video
Of course, I'd expect just that, but he is failing to factor in the Rick gates and manafort conspiracy to defraud the us charges, in his statements about all the wrong doing is unrelated to the core investigation
And by doing so, and rolling with 'it's all unrelated' set of info, he doesn't have to collide with details inconvenient to his conclusion
Itd be a superior job of opinion forming on his part to take stock of matters of fact that are available to him
personally dont know much about that, but from everything ive heard about the trump/russia investigation i havent seen anything like a smoking gun, not even the smoke from a gun. theres been tons of bs that have popped up around it with people questioning trumps actions, other tangential accusations that have nothing to do with trump/russia simply to defame him, ect. id think if anything were actually released that gave anyone a reason to believe the trump/russia connection, tim would have mentioned it and i think i would have heard about it by now. thing with muellar is that he can potentially not share any information he has uncovered in his investigation and may be holding some kind of smoking gun until he can find finger prints on it, but so far things have been incredibly slow and uneventful in the investigation. people have investigated less and found more by this point in other conspericys
Fair opinion, especially considering the blizzard of details to fog up our field of view
In your judgement, what would a "smoking gun" or just compelling evidence, look like for you ?
i think that the best evidence that news media only care about the russian collusion story because it sells is the actual fact that we really havent gotten anything legitimently good on this story yet, but its still the number 1 story they push.
you need something that establishes collusion, not simply conversation
you need actual evidence that someone from trump with knowledge by trump tried to have some interaction with russia that exchanged the right information that could have any impact at all on the election with intent to impact the election.
Quid pro quo
i dont think your going to get anything remotely that satisfying at this point, which is to say that muellar cant find something that leads to some kind of legal case, however the problem is that if you dont have something that conclusive for whatever happens after the report then whatever case brought against the president will be lacking evidence even if it is full of motivation
most people dont actually care what mueller finds, they only care that he finds enough to get someone to try and throw trump out, even the media doesent care because anything russia/trump drama is good for them even if it eventually goes nowhere
Right, so material evidence, not circumstantial or testimony, but documentary material evidence explicitly demonstrating conspiracy
your talking about a president of the united states
a trial could be had on circumstantial or testimony, but for the presidental seat, i cant imagine a world where you would successfuly try with only that
I doubt that effortwould be brought forward in that case, its disruptive to do so even with overwelmjg compelling evidence and I imagine the preferred resolution would be a political one
i have no clue what people will actually do in case of any form of evidence, though i actually dont think anyone cares about disruption, if that was a consern of this government shit would be quite different and we probably wouldent be having this conversation
Lol yes if it were simpler dynamics, but I think the group dynamics are those of atleast several hundred people
the united states is polerized now, possibly without resolution, in that situation youll never disrupt your base by going after their percieved enemy unless you lose
trump is unlikely to be impeached but presidents have been threatened with less
trump/russia collusion would be on the scale of watergate in the perception of modern america, in reallity to any sane person what many people might even call collusion probably shouldent be called that so its posible what they deside he did will likely be much more benign that watergate was
we dont live in a sane country though
What if the president and his team, when the report is finalized, fight the release?
fight the release?
If there indeed is no wrong doing to be found through investigation, and thus the final report informs us of the absence of wrong doing...would trump fight the public disclosure of the final report?
i think it would be unwise for the trump administration to obstruct the report in any way. doesent look good and i cant conceive cercomstances where it would look good
even if there was evidence of wrong doing it would look worse to get in the way
tons of people wouldent care but the center would
honestly he might be able to get away with that, there might actually not be much trump cant get away with now because frankly we could be at the very end of our government if things progress a bit further in uncooperation
Well as long as congress remains steadfast in their commitments, the president could set himself on fire and the government would sustain
we dont actually have many people who i legitamently think care about the government as it is. i think most people only care about the government because its the system they can get their side to do things with, just a means to an end rather than a end itself. i think people wanting only what they want so much can tear this country in half and disolve the nation and its government. im not sure when it will actually get to that point but its where weve been heading for the last 50 years, and a lack of cooperation is going to be the form of its destructor
a government that wont cooperate is one that does not exist, currently the us government actually doesent exist right now, but it has the idea of a hiatus, theres more than one way a government can refuse to cooperate though and many of those other tactics are used far more commonly than the government being "shut down" as its called
Rather cynical and unatteibuting summary, the gears of such a machine as governance is has levers somewhere, down to the county and district, representative elections for terms of office function very well and are the means, the ends will always be in some flux and shift mildly as the circumstances and desires of the people float with it
Tons of good peeps prop that up and have over time to meet the demands.
no idea if true
@Poppy Rider the author identifies himself as...wait for it... "Maximus Deplorabilis". Off to a firm start ...
*gasp* SEXIST AND MISOGYNISTIC!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!
IM LITERALLY SHAKING
http://malmo.lokaltidningen.se/nyheter/2019-01-15/-Hund-torterades-med-cigaretter-under-inbrott-3926413.html Swedish news: Theives break into a house and steals 100'000 SEK of jewelry and leaves cigarette burns on the family dog.
SOMEONE REACTED WITH A WHITE SUPREMACIST SYMBOL UNDER MY LAST MESSAGE! REEEEEEEE
Brexit streams are up. Final day of debate
House told May to get fucked
Ok two options
No deal or I guess second referendum
if it goes to second refurendum that will set a terrible precedent in british politics
surely they know not to do that
They will get reamed if they go for a second referendum
Corbyn is trying to yeet May
Does the labor party have the pull to accomplish that?
Not that I'm aware of
Someone tabled a motion of no confidence
That was Comrade Corbyn
Pushing to get May yeeted
People are trying to start shit using points of order
YouTubeLaw on updates
dave rubin deleting his patreon
fuck gilette, what the hell is this?
is this video real??
i love laura loomer
she's such a troll
Trannies are a cancer... we need to snub them like the allergic kids. Let em die on the peanut butter we snuck into his food when he got up lol poor parental genes
Gentetic disorder fucks
<#398973785426100234> would like to talk to you 😘
I mean, let them do their thing and most won't reproduce.
chemically castrating gay little boys is super cool
Gays 'reproduce' by molesting young boys.
"The hackers used malicious software sent via email to SEC employees"
Fucking boomers falling for phishing emails
Wait a sec, I think i know how they confused david webb for a white guy
well i dont
spit it out
David webb is Jason Bourne's real name
someone probably saw the bourne legacy recently
then when someone started asking about david webb they said "yea hes a white male"
*press X to doubt*
Remember when it was a crazy conspiracy theory that rich people were doing this? I member...
just raze it and start over, already
These accusations get more ridiculous by the day
thats fake right
The accusation yes
The world we live in no
I wish this was a dream too
RICO? jesus christ lol thats funny
SPLC has been an corrupted by the SJNazis for a long time
They've certainly fucked over enough people
SPLC needs to be rebuilt from the ground up
So does ACLU and FreePress
Shaun King is up to his slimy tactics again
Go look at Twitter
I already staried into the depth of hell today
not seeing the stupid
I'm seeing a bunch of verified accounts talking about this, including that asshole Tariq Nasheed
To quote the old redneck, "Well if a boy is that horrible, why the hell ain't no one paddled his butt yet?"
https://twitter.com/search?src=typd&q=%22Shaun%20King%22 Dunno on the top article on why King is getting involved
People be talking about him, 41.1k tweets
A non exhaustive but quite lengthy and as well sourced as you can get (for this kind of things) list of incidents about the gilets jaunes protests, put together by a french forum (the "blabla 18-25" of jeuxvideo.com to be precise). I think it's still being updated. It has more details and "events" than the twitter thread, i can translate if need be (just ping me).
Coal is dying
https://www.peta.org/blog/traditional-masculinity/ what kind of fucking reality are we living in
be vegan or die 😉
CCGT is displacing coal for good reasons.
But lol, all that idle wind/solar capacity buildout sustained by your federal tax dollars....
theres a lot of people who seem to think that the coal retirements in the united states and trump are connected, im not sure trump was actually expecting to use more coal in the united states, pretty sure his idea is to become a coal exporter
im not sure what his exact statements on it are, or if he even makes exact statements about anything
Right, most of the coal demand growth is overseas.
There's pretty much nothing short of subsidizing coal directly that Trump could do to make coal competitive with CCGT in the US.
What is CCGT?
goes into the next phase
man I really hope that CBS looses
Sorry, only German Link, but that's insane:
French Green Party member Yves Cochet demands less children and more immigration.
and another thing: Look up "Gloria von Thurn und Taxis, Museum New York". I can only find German sources but she should have been honored and was uninvited by the New Yorker "Museo del Barrio"...
Obviously because of her political vews...
Title said that she should have been honored by the Museom but was uninvited...
About Yves Cochet the best I could find was Infowars:
the German Source above and a french one that Black Pidgeon Speaks tweeted:
From Russia Today
Ah, the one in the Court were Kavenaugh was before?
Whoa, the Chief Troll continues to Troll :
Wich one? :D
The Trump one?
both of them
Other outlets are saying she's cancer free
This is from almost a week ago
Damn you DDG not putting latest at the front
Cancer Free but bedridden with Pneumonia
Pnemonia could kill somebody at her age
especially if you got some parts of your lung removed...
Increased risk of death
I didn't even know lung cancer was operable.
And how the hell did she survive pancreatic cancer?
Probably a segment and caught early
bombs going off in franch i have video but dont have perms to post
Tim did post a video last night with some spicy stuff in it
can i send someone with perms the video then they post it in here its quite shocking
looking into the video further it was probally just a failed chemistry experiment a bad one though
just heard about the cops killing Laquan McDonald got acquitted. Oh man, we could see riots
no we will remember freddy gray
baltimore was up in arms over him
fresh poll from Pew Research Center: Gen Z looks a lot like Millennials Politically, which is in sharp contrast to what many are saying that Gen Z is more conservative
both unsure if trust poll, and seeing the logic of that statement
Sample Size is roughly 11k, with about 10k being adults 18 + over, and around 1k being teens between 12-17
Pew I generally trust, so this is an interesting result, which doesn't reflect my anecdotal experience
depends on if they focused on cities or hit rural as well
cities trend democrat
those are a lot of leading questions