When the chips are down who would most of the world side with? South America with the US, Europe the US.

Cant exert power externally if internal support doesnt exist for it

India with the US.

Russia has massive dissent to the point where they have to arrest opposition leaders to keep putin in power

China has done a good job of shoving dissent down, but when their economic bubble bursts it will rush back to the surface

The fact of the matter is that if the US isnt projecting power around the globe someone else will be

I have yet to find another country that is as bad at imperialism as the US is, so im going with them

No other country is willing to go into that much debt

wooo world hegemony

" is as bad at imperialism as the US is, so im going with them"

this comment entertains me, idk why

unfortunately the united states form of imperialism is no more lasting than any other. its just that the problems were having from it are different

infact its slowly slipping from us right now

you cant control the world unless you control the people, you cant control the people through occupation (old form imperialism) and you cant control the people through instigation (neo-con imperialism) the position that the usa has influincing the rest of the world is directly through the power it physically presents outward toward the rest of the world. ultimately we still rule by fear but its more of a fear of us getting involved in any affaire between foreign powers than it is a fear of direct attack. this keeps the rest of the world more or less docial. but the cracks are begining to show. this is highly taxing on the united states requiring a constantly high trained invasion army at all times and also having a highly global focus that distracts from internal affaire on a top down level. the people at the bottom care about whats going on inside their own country just as much as the people at the top care about everything going on outside their country to far to great extremes. weve created a condition of living on a global scale that mandates constant communication and cooperation between peoples without anscesteral paralells to draw from. all of this is slowing the united states down to a screeching halt while the development of everywhere else, while stunted by the united states looming above it, is steadly growing, though even then their method of growth hasent been healthy, underneith everything i see an eminant economic collapse as business world wide contenues to fail without taxe payer assistance

Nice blog

duh, thats why the US is the worst at imperialism

Instead of occupying every nation in the world weaker than it and forcibly annexing it

they just build a base and establish an alliance with them

https://www.tribtalk.org/2018/06/06/abbotts-school-safety-plan-respects-the-2nd-amendment/

@Grenade123 Do you find that ppl are less likely to break the law coz of fear of losing their right to own a gun?

Gun owners commit less crimes than even police officers so I'd say so.

But not for fear of losing their rights.

http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/ny-metro-segregated-beach-20180606-story.html

Segregation is progressive

"Unfortunately, our website is currently unavailable in most European countries."

Trust a Jew to cause more problems between Men and Women, wasn't the Jewish created ideology known as feminism enough?

lul not everything was created by jews.. theyre not gods

I know they didn't create everything which is bad but they did create feminism. I linked some proof in <#398973785426100234>.

I got a story for tomorrow but I need a lawyer

trying to find a lawyer with experience in press issues

Does anyone have the vid where tim talks about how wikipedia works and some of its flaws but strengths? Im in another convo somewhere which is semi related to how rating sites and credibility are useful, semi tied to the Pravda site.

maybe theres a contact somewhere for that "youtuber law" guy?

or who's the other one? ... something french?

the lawyer covering sargon's case?

yeah

think hes in tech law tho

well hes covering fair use

that's not tech

necessarily

but the other one .. something french... think he is all about copyright n stuff

leonard french

serious video game news about what games will remain in steam store https://steamcommunity.com/games/593110/announcements/detail/1666776116200553082

i emailed youtuber law

good advice

whats this law bussiness all about?

@Timcast Could you link the articles you refer to in your videos in the description? It helps when someone wants to look into them further

youtuber law was good on the maddox stuff

is this about tims youtube strike or something else?

@Arch-Fiend wow, I'm surprised with their stance

im glad about their stance, i just hope they have the fortitude to hold it agianst what will happen to them now they have taken to their principles vs pressure

There's some tricks to it

As "hate speech" is "illegal" in some countries

But I guess they would just limit those games in the specific countries

Probably. What they are going to probably do is wait for court orders or something. Basically saying "hey, you tell us what is illegal" as much as they can.

But I image that after this blows over, the SJWs will mostly forget about them.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ufrkdA9Cbak

@Timcast sorry to ping so late, but do you have a Patreon amount that would allow you to be self sufficient so you wouldn't have to worry about the YouTube monetization anymore

Saudi Arabia wont have any games left to play if they stick to sharia rules, come to think of it

This ones odd but amusing, saw it while browsing pol.
https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/christianity-china

oh this is a problem. facebook selling data to chinese company that was already questionable to the fbi http://archive.is/UQCts

Now if only Congress would understand what that means

if only people actually understood what this means. most people veiw privacy violation as "this bad" and government says "no its good" and huge fractions of the population just beleive them

They believe it when its "their side" thats in charge

when both sides say it thats even worse

but yeah partisanship is a problem

Or that they dont know that sharing info with anyone with no oversight on what is done with it is bad

thats usually those "I've got nothing to hide" people

They don't consider that if its up to the government, there is

cuz if its up to the government, everyone gets their whole lives regulated

Well anything can be used as blackmail

Or used to doxx

privacy gets in the way of justice.

the issue with justice is that all people are guilty in the eyes of government

hackers claming to be the ones who doxed hogg hit me up and gave me a recording

Phil defranco said he wouldnt mention it because he doesnt want to encourage people to do it

what are yalls thoughts

swatted not doxed

freudian slip? technicly this is a crime so if you have incriminating information about it arnt you legally required to give that to the police before publicizing it?

Would you be willing to post said recording here?

And yeah, I'm pretty sure that's supposed to be passed off to the authorities

its the 911 call

its not evidence they dont already have

Ah

and its public record

but I did an interview and they said it was for fun and they didnt even know who hogg was

I don't think I buy that personally

I do

they kept forgetting his name

or saying it wrong

One does not swatt a celebrity on accident

Ya know?

someone sent them names they thought would be high profile

they claim to have swatted tariq nasheed too

this is all stuff that the authoritys have right? i never heard of this befor now

They sound like a bunch of pricks

this is from the interview i did with them

Though, I have strong feelings on swatting

isint the interveiw you did incriminating? or you dont have their identity?

i dont know anything about them other than their twitter accounts

Anything they have to back it up?

actually its very likely you dont consitering who were talking about

Like its a simple claim to make

Phil usually has good judgment for these sorts of things imo