more free games! https://store.steampowered.com/app/391720/

THAT should be the right link

You mean what I put in <#398973785426100234> ?

@Timcast the victim blaming part at the end of your Lindsay Shepherd video is bullshit and I'm disappointed in you.

victim blaming?

You're basically saying that if you want to be employable you have to shut up and let left-wing activists abuse you.

you mean when i said she has a right to stand up for herself and you cant expect people to take things lying down

Like she shouldn't have spoken out about the tribunal.

You said "in terms of arguing that she has become unemployable, that's actually not really Laurier's fault".

And then you're saying that her having the foresight to record the tribunal was the genesis for her being unemployable.

Like if she had just taken the abuse in silence and let activists run the university, gone along with their system like a good comrade, that she'd be fine.

What's tragic is that the Canadian justice system is likely to follow your reasoning. I don't think she'll win this suit, and she'll be basically a pariah.

depends how she "became unemployable" was that really lauriers fault?

I don't think she's going to win. And the result of that will be that fewer people in Academia will speak out against the political indoctrination that goes on there.

my guess would be settelment

Because political activist professors with power over your future career can destroy you and face no consequences. The only logical conclusion will be to keep silent and toe the line.

So political indoctrination in university will continue unchallenged. People might joke that the left can't meme and that people are getting annoyed at political correctness, but that's just trivial ankle-biting. The left has real institutional power that is not being challenged.

The left is winning.

She technically did make herself unemployable, but the question would more be whether the government will rule if the environment she wants to work in is acceptable if it considers her actions as cause to be unemployable.

The defense will claim that she has to prove she is unemployable. She has to prove a negative.

She can get a job at starbucks.

It's not a strong lawsuit.

Whenever you are trying to force change you need internal or external pressure. Any action you take will be unlikely to satisfy both parties.

Her only hope is that the university gives her a settlement to avoid bad press, but the press in Canada hate her guts.

from what it sounded like, it has little to do with her employableness .. and more about how she was treated while working there

Was this a public university or a private one?

Lmao i doubt she could get a job at starbucks.

I supose it doesnt really matter, there are tons of things she could put in the law suit

Defamation of character would be the easiest one I could think of

you'd still have to prove an impact to her earnings or future earnings to get any award, though. unfortunately its hard to put a finger on the fact that half or more of the private sector won't hire her and neither will the public/gov sector because it would be very political.

She will never get hired by a state/government agency.

whelp... looks like Tommy Robinson will be dead soon

F

As far as I'm aware there are no universities in Canada that would uphold the principles of the Chicago Letter, and none want the risk of hiring a person like Shepherd. I doubt she could find someone as a PhD advisor.

Says that suit claims that someone told her " showing the clip was illegal under human rights law"

this seems very simple and easy to prove

That's in the recording as far as I'm aware.

So either A it is illegal under human rights law to question laws

or B The university/person has stepped beyond thier bounds

Bill C-16?

Canada does not have free speech, so it's possible that the law could be interpreted that way.

They dont say, just that showing the clip was Illegal under human rights laws

Now the university has to argue one of those two points in court

I want them to hang that person out to dry to make an example of her

However i doubt it will come to that, theyll probably try to settle before they have to get involved in this free speech debate that puts peterson back in the spotlight

@Atkins She fought back by publishing a secret recording. Shes going on the offensive by suing now

in any fight bad shit happens

im unemployable in a shitload of jobs

publicity does that

She should not have had to fight anything because universities should not be political indoctrination centers.

Yeah its just impossible to explain that legitimately because there's no proof.

So her choices where say something and fight back and get ruined, or go along with the political indoctrination.

right

shes fighting back and she will be surrounded by eh collateral damage of that

I'm saying it's bullshit to say it's her own fault for fighting back.

I really dont think she will win the suit but Laurier will likely settle

It's victim blaming.

personal responsibility and choosing your battles

and this isnt even a pyrrhic victory

side note

Whatever buzzwords you choose to call it, atkins, it is what it is. Tim isn't making up the rules.

new merch will start appearing on my channel

beanies for everyone

If choosing your battles means keeping silent and allowing political indoctrination to go unchallenged, what battle should she have chosen to fight instead?

Just keep her head down, finish her masters, then keep her head down and stay on the PhD track, then keep her head down and try to get a professorship then keep her head down and try to get tenure to do what?

Retire?

if she wanted a PhD yes

Just keep parroting the party line?

because adults make hard choices

she chose to fight back

in that she has become unemplyable

she chose to publish the audio

she could have kept the audio and filed suit

no pbulicity

the point is

Laurier is a public university.

fight back, whatever

It should not be a political indoctrination center.

but dont blame bad PR on anyone other than the person who generated the publicity

That professors are using a public university for political purposes is wrong. It's not a case where you can just stay silent and let it happen if you want to have a functioning democracy.

It is abuse of power.

And you're saying it's OK that they abused their power.

That it's her fault.

what

need some writing to put under it

"Choose your battles"

whats this for?

the joke was supposed to be

its fake symbolism

its not a flipped pyramid like the far lefties but its knocked over

About that merchandise, will there be T-shirts with just a picture of a beanie on them?

some latin phrase would work well

and people would freak out

i can make a shirt with a beanie on it

respice in toro

thats latin for look under the couch

haha

Legi mortuus linguis

nihil hinc