Message from @Atkins
Discord ID: 456565451229495297
She can get a job at starbucks.
It's not a strong lawsuit.
Whenever you are trying to force change you need internal or external pressure. Any action you take will be unlikely to satisfy both parties.
Her only hope is that the university gives her a settlement to avoid bad press, but the press in Canada hate her guts.
from what it sounded like, it has little to do with her employableness .. and more about how she was treated while working there
Was this a public university or a private one?
Lmao i doubt she could get a job at starbucks.
I supose it doesnt really matter, there are tons of things she could put in the law suit
Defamation of character would be the easiest one I could think of
you'd still have to prove an impact to her earnings or future earnings to get any award, though. unfortunately its hard to put a finger on the fact that half or more of the private sector won't hire her and neither will the public/gov sector because it would be very political.
She will never get hired by a state/government agency.
whelp... looks like Tommy Robinson will be dead soon
F
As far as I'm aware there are no universities in Canada that would uphold the principles of the Chicago Letter, and none want the risk of hiring a person like Shepherd. I doubt she could find someone as a PhD advisor.
Says that suit claims that someone told her " showing the clip was illegal under human rights law"
this seems very simple and easy to prove
That's in the recording as far as I'm aware.
So either A it is illegal under human rights law to question laws
or B The university/person has stepped beyond thier bounds
Bill C-16?
They dont say, just that showing the clip was Illegal under human rights laws
Now the university has to argue one of those two points in court
I want them to hang that person out to dry to make an example of her
However i doubt it will come to that, theyll probably try to settle before they have to get involved in this free speech debate that puts peterson back in the spotlight
@Atkins She fought back by publishing a secret recording. Shes going on the offensive by suing now
in any fight bad shit happens
im unemployable in a shitload of jobs
publicity does that
She should not have had to fight anything because universities should not be political indoctrination centers.
Yeah its just impossible to explain that legitimately because there's no proof.
So her choices where say something and fight back and get ruined, or go along with the political indoctrination.
right
shes fighting back and she will be surrounded by eh collateral damage of that
I'm saying it's bullshit to say it's her own fault for fighting back.
I really dont think she will win the suit but Laurier will likely settle
It's victim blaming.
personal responsibility and choosing your battles
and this isnt even a pyrrhic victory
side note
Whatever buzzwords you choose to call it, atkins, it is what it is. Tim isn't making up the rules.