newsroom
Discord ID: 398858182455459853
87,357 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 294/874
| Next
they are destroying the companies they work for which does nothing but leave them poor and make a giant hole to be filled by someone new.
they are driving up competition for the places they are the gatekeepers which does nothing but take away their own power.
When midterms roll around we'll see who has the real power. My money is on the right.
The war is far from over. But you need to have a goal to work towards because "not that" is not a valid goal and will just leave a nasty hole that will get filled with something even worse. it always does.
my money is on 4chan being able to pull off a stunt that makes the liberals boycott the election in protest of trump
I have no such confidence. I don't expect progressives to play by the rules. I expect them to cheat, collude, and try to generate crises to manipulate. I expect them to continue their takeover of high tech, and use AI and big data against their enemies.
They will try but if they don't control the population it won't help them.
Trump was an accident. Nobody, not even Trump, expected him to win. The margin is razor thin here.
also ye almost all people end up with a person of their same race, even where other races are available and where both parties would not be condemned for it, it still does not happen at all
The media didn't expect them to win because they only listen to themselves.
Better control of media, especially big tech, will erode that margin. People already are understanding how media generates mass killers. I expect that will be weaponized by the far left.
People don't trust the media
And the demographics continue their inexorable shift.
Exactly. They don't listen to the people and that's why they will lose again. They never learnt from their mistakes in the 2016 election and actually doubled down.
This is not a time for blind optimism.
The only real problem is them trying to rig the cense by removing the citzen status question
Hey guys.
The progressive left has their hands around our throats and is choking us. Trump was a handful of sand thrown in their eyes out of desperation. It bought us a breath. Nothing more.
There is no relaxing or resting. This is still a vicious fight for survival.
Of course there's no resting. I just think the left has become less powerful since the election.
And you think people will just let that happen? Trump got us a breath because we threw a punch. You think we'll just stop while their hands are still around our throat?
Fight is far from over.
mixed race is the second largest factor in marriage breakups, second only to one partner having a anxiety disorder
also over 2x more likely for abuse
Most people just want to be left alone. So long as a party is actively trying to butt into people's lives, people will resist that.
Normally I wouldnโt care but it looks like SJWism has gotten to Miss America too. Something about getting rid of the swimsuit competition and being more inclusive to women of all sizes as they will no longer judge according to their โoutward physical appearancesโ.
Does that mean I have a shot at Mr. Universe?
i agree though, the best woman would also be smart
BUT
i mean, i'm surprised it took this long. Not that care. they can kill that. i'll vote it as a sacrificial lamb to sick the ravenous SJW's on to distract them while we work elsewhere
you gotta understand, most smart people are also above average looking, as the genes that cause there superior intelect, also express themselves in other ways
Smart to them isnโt the same as smart to us.
now that i agree with
because Hawking was so handsome in his wheelchair
he was, before the chair
plus for a man
being an expert is likely more attractive then being a pretty thing
I think both are equally important.
i disagree
As is a good personality.
for men looking to attract women signaling competence beats age
for a woman looking to atract a man, fertility beats competence
on average
but significantly
its very possible for example, that because we are a dimorphic species
that the same gene expressed in a male body results in higher intelligence, results in being more attractive in a woman
not exclusively ofc
that same gene will make both a man and a woman smarter, just a man more smarter then the woman
where do you pull these ideas from? there is a reason the term "tech bro" is hilarious. they are not usually good with women, nor always that good lookin, so they have to rely on intellect.
vs good looking people who just need to exist and shit is thrown at them
a tech bro is just one expression of intelligence
not ALL smart people are in tech
i suspect their akwardness comes ffrom childhood trauma a lot more then anything else
or math, or science, or medicine?
STEM is not exactly a field known for good looks.
ye cause its mostly men
competence beats fertility signaling in men, by a lot
in other words, smart men don't necessarily look good.
?
not required no, but the effects correlate cause the same gene expresses itself different
its why for example the normal distribution of IQ is smaller in women then in men
but the averages are the same
>most smart people are also above average looking
>smart men are not known for their good looks
these seem to contradict one another
being smart makes a man look good because it signals competence
that is a very different definition of look than the topic of physical appearance, which is what the topic was and there was no change in distinction made.
don't be like Jordan Peterson.
it leads to a lot of confusing fluff with a technical manual attached
i dono, i guess the idea is that i consider the miss elections to be something of the "ideal mate" competitions
where its just about being the prettiest
those kinds of contests are all about physical looks.
its why you get a bunch of body builders for the male version, and unhealthily skinny females for the female version.
both are unrealistic, hyper-reality reflections of the current "beauty" standards that have nothing to do with biological desires outside society influenced lust created by our biological rutting algorithm.
โ The Xbox One will reportedly soon support Alexa and Google Assistant โ by Tom Warren on The Verge
The surveillance state in alliance with Big Tech are creeping deeper into our lives. Donโt but these products.
http://archive.today/yLgTF
i guess you talk about what they are, and i talk about what i'd hoped they would be
as i never actually follow that shite
oh, i wish they actually reflected anything worth while. i might actually watch them.
but no, people watch these things specifically to turn off. Its like...which book is it.... where the dudes wife is at home just watching her shows.
1984? 451?
Ferinheight 451. The wall TVs with really short programs.
i dono
wouldnt the "miss" competition not imply an ideal mate? i mean if its just for a one night stand, why use miss
Yeah, too bad most guys stop thinking the moment all the blood rushes south. So idea mate turns into "she is pretty, duuuuuh"
Whats this I missed?
wait wassnt the word miss invented by feminists to mean an unmarried woman?
does that mean it used to be ms competitions about the best wife?
Invented by feminists?
What did they call unmarried women before then?
you know, one of their words caught on for a change
girls?
Doubt it. I dont think Ive seen anything medieval or even renaissance era that mentioned them as "girls"
Even noble women were called "ladies"
And non were called women really. But when addressed directly?
โ This dance troupe performs with lasers in their buttsโ by Ali Gitlow on Vice
The LGBTQ+ community is protesting Trump with ass lasers? What could this disgusting degeneracy hope to accomplish?
http://archive.today/1YG9x
Link not working
You saw the PJW on that one wierdo who eats fruit?
After having his wife carry it in her baby pocket
Give it a bit. The link is functional.
you mean in her pussy?
gotta be careful about that
87,357 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 294/874
| Next