politics-free-for-all
Discord ID: 509549100061163520
26,854 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 100/108
| Next
@Khanclansith Don't care about your theories, show me the proof nigga
You haven't even shown the proof Google search algorithm censors conservatives
I have and you just keep screeching "GOOGLE IS RIGHT!"
Lots of text and no links
no proof at all. I can't imagine why
I'm still waiting for you to describe your own articles
Surley DuckDuckGo can give you something ๐
Surely you can too
Find me the articles and I will describe all 4 of them STARTING with the one you wish to debunk
I can't send you a link to conversations with police officers and Federal Agents I had in person.
Still @RekItRalph is a NAzi pig
Proborbly won't work but I'm actually curious now
And shit
yeah send me that link
I'm done here, This isn't even an argument for me, This is a test to make sure you read what you post
I read all your shit then prove it wrong
just did ๐
And the fact that you refuse to accept any other personal experiences means that you will not even listen to anything people tell you.
You know what you haven't proven wrong?
My claims that you don't read your own articles
@mikeflarkin let's go over some of the more relevant points on your article here
People share their experiences... So take it with a grain of salt
The only point relevant to this discussion is 8. The search engine blacklist.
someone still is a racist
who is it?
Even the "Left" is complaining about censorship https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2017/09/19/goog-s19.html
And Rightwing sites complain of being censored https://www.thenewamerican.com/tech/computers/item/26021-how-google-censors-the-new-american-and-other-conservatives
Axel Springer is not conservative. It also says you have to violate guidelines which says nothing about conservatives being banned. They also scolded JC Penny for trying to game their system. e-Ventures got removed from the list compleatley.
So nothing here is evidence that conservatives in particular were altered in page ranking let alone cencored
There is a link to Aeon so let me just read that real quick
U still a racist
Can you deny it?
Anyone here familiar with the Black Swan myth?
*HAVE YOU LEARN TO CODE?*
The story goes that a sailor came ashore after a time at sea and spotted a teacher giving a lecture on birds by the docks. The sailor waited and after the class asked the professor if he knew about birds. The professor told him he knew every bird... The sailor asks what the name is for a swan that is black. The professor replies that there are no black swans. The sailor tells him there is. The professor opens his book and shows there is not entry for black swans.
The point of the story is that the sailors had seen it for themselves while the academic hadn't.
So one of your articles led to an Aeon article which outlined how the bias ACTUALLY works. https://aeon.co/essays/how-the-internet-flips-elections-and-alters-our-thoughts
Google stimulates confirmation bias. Which means YOU can use it and get results YOU want. Consider that this was written in 2016 and the more recent GDPR allows your to request your own information despite what the article states
That's why I read a collection of articles rather than just the first one
Google white family you turd
Send me the third picture
right now
The SEME experiment run was based on political candidates rather than factual issues.
<:NPC:500042527231967262>
Have you heard of the Shirts vs Skin color experiment?
nope
The boy can't read
give him a break
It was a test where a research team video taped people reading statements and used that to test bias. They then gave the tapes to people to watch and then questioned the people on what people said.
Let's go over some other articles you posted. Starting with this. https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2017/09/19/goog-s19.html
They said that Google changed the algorithim and there traffic dropped. Therefore censorship. That is not proof of deliborate or even algorithmic censorship on a political basis. This is the corrilation causation fallacy
*World Socialist Website*
That
Is your source?
*Stalin's fan club says*
*Stalin is a good cheese*
*Carry on citizen*
In the case of 4/5 people of the same ethnicity saying the same thing, the majority of observers cited 5/5 of that ethnicity having the same view. But when the lines of dialogue were divided up by shirt color with 4/5 sharing the same statement, the observers falsely cited everyone with the same shirt color as having the same dialogue.
***Hears Genocide***
@Raitisan I put that one up as proof not only the right is complaining. I don't really care about the propaganda site.
let's look at the other source you guys posted https://www.thenewamerican.com/tech/computers/item/26021-how-google-censors-the-new-american-and-other-conservatives
The author of this said he typed in โโSelwyn Dukeโ pointed fingers like gun and said bang โthe new American.โโ (with quotations) and his page did not come up but Google said that it omitted results
The point on the Shirts vs Skin Color experiment is that in2014 I could find it all over the internet... now I can't seem to find it.
When I type it in myself, there is no message saying the search results have been ommitted. In fact, the only articles that come up are this one
and the factual reporting is mixed so... yeah https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-new-american/
When I come up with *facts* that @RekItRalph is a racist I can only see this
So, the cabbage must be a black hating monogoliod
You guys think the the ACLU, Harvard, MIT and all those other sites are liberal biased but you trust trash tabloid websites which are provably fake
You guy's don't understand bias
"When I type it in myself, there is no message saying the search results have been omitted" If Google is censoring would they admit they omitted?
ACLU are trash nowadays
I mean FFS I literally just explained how Google bias actually worked and how it could help YOU counter MY searches
Do I trust the New American? no. I would say they are a tabloid... but they have a right to speak.
10-15 years ago when they stood for something, yes
But you guys didn't even read the aeon article and you posted a bunch of trash links
Then why was it posted as a source
@RekItRalph is still racist
you guys posted it
I glanced at both, they're both from 2017
You refuse the evidence?
Nope. I already shown you evidence that Google is bias. It just doesn't work the way you think
If you have people coming out and saying I was censored left and right do you just believe the company?
@RekItRalph Is still a Nazi
No I don't just belive them on faith. You gotta prove it
companies say that all the time
The fact that I have been unsubscribed from the youtube channel "The Gun Collective" 15 times means nothing to you too
Alright. Imma play vidya and when I get back later you better have dat proof ready. Not just for the Google thing but for the list of democratic shooters as well
You think that's bad? I was autosubscribed to youtube help
That's YouTube not the search algorithim
@RekItRalph Is a Nazi until he makes a case - he is not
I was autosubscribed to CNN's youtube channel.
sigh, next time, read your own links before posting them
Be back with the proof that you read those four articles by tomorrow
*sigh*
that's how you do it
I'm gonna have to make a cutoff so he can't just read them a month later
you softchease
Yeah?
not you
Want to guess what those blue spots in the middle are?
China?
Somali?
Most dangerous cities in the US?
And they voted Democrat
I'm not American, but I will say- Baltimore
Let me guess what the response will be, "But that doesn't prove anything! Learn to use google!"
The pic in that article is Baltimore. Recognized it instantly since Iโm from there.
I stand by my point, where you have high Democrat voting, you have High shooting numbers...
We had armed robbers break into our house. Would have been really bad if we were home at the time.
Do you feel comfortable saying which area you live in @CreativeRealms ?
Sounds rough, anyone got hurt?
I donโt live there anymore. It was basically on the border between Baltimore city and county. Even though it was the suburbs there is a lot of crime.
And no one was hurt.
Good to hear...
Ok... Would you say that the area votes Republican or Democrat?
Baltimore is Democrat
My specific community votes republican but most other areas are pure blue.
Interesting. Any other observations about the area you would like to share?
Nothing that would be a good reflection of what itโs probably like now. Havenโt lived there for 14 years.
Probably changed a lot.
Anybody interested in all the news of South Africa? ๐
Ok. Do you have any specific memories on the crime? @SilverAndJade What is the bad news now?
Not really
We've been having load shedding recently ๐
Our electrical company is going downhill
Oh, in the US we call those "rolling black outs."
I wasnโt home but I had gotten back from school and our side door was broken into and a lot of furniture got moved around. The robbers ran away before they could take much because a neighbor saw them poking their heads out the door and called the police. We knew they were armed because my dad found a bullet in the house after.
XD
@CreativeRealms Was there indications of who did it or what they were targeting?
They had stolen someoneโs van to steal stuff but left it in our driveway.
There's this guy that does something similar to Tim, in regards to reading/researching news stories for South Africa
The things that don't really make it to Global and sometimes local news
TheBirdsNestOz
Or "Loving Life" is his channel name
I think the only details about the suspects was they were African American. Besides that I donโt know anything.
gimme a link
Starbird Disagrees covers South Africa a lot.
@CreativeRealms Interesting. Am I correct that the police were already there by the time you got home? (Either came and went or were still there)
Does South Africa allow self armament?
Nope
Fuk
I think the police had left by the time I got back from school.
I can relate
Lolz, we have gun licensing laws that require you to shoot a around 200 rounds per year to keep the license
That...
So I guess it's kinda allowed, but normal people don't keep guns
Is really bad
It's also the case that "Firing a warning shot" is illegal
Interesting. @CreativeRealms Thank you for that information... That is the sort of stuff I like to go over. And not in the realm of Found on Google.
Really?!
Yup
Np
You're also not allowed to shoot any tresspassers
"Negligent Discharge" i think is the thing with "Warning Shoots"
You'll get sent to jail
Fuk, I mean at least we can shoot in the air before going to prison
That was the only time we were directly involved in a crime but sometimes there would be car chases down the street or sounds of shooting at night.
Strick regulation of Firearms eliminates Citizenship in the virtue that it rescinds the right of self defense.
Hunting is still the game
Bows are illegal as fuck
We're kinda waiting for things to go south here. The change to the constitution draft is supposed to be finished in march to allow for land appropriation
@CreativeRealms Where I live here there is a fire house near by so I always here the fire truck and ambulances.
Which is bullshit
And our electrical company needs to meet BEE standards (similar to America's equality proposals) which means it needs to fire at least 3000 skilled workers to meet racial standards
@SilverAndJade I think it is fair to say that the ruling ANC is more concerned with "Zulu Ethnic people" than the whole of South Africa
Mostly yeah, but what's happening is more of a communist state type of thing
All land is going to be owned by the government
<:TimThink:482277772497125378>
As a Latvian, I can relate...
And basically skilled workers are thrown to the wayside to make space for unskilled workers that meet ethnic standards
Ethnically Motivates Socialism was called National Socialism back in the day...
And of course, with a communist government, there's always corruption
So money disappears constantly in the billions
The old abriviation for National Socialists was NAZI in German
๐ Lolz, well, I can't deny that I feel that's the way our country's going
So we have Zulu NAZIs running the country?
Anyone offers you a train ride with a free shower run
Ufffff
XD
I wonder if tim would be interested in the Loving Life channel
Hey @Timcast, check out this for news on South Africa https://www.youtube.com/user/TheBirdsNestOz/videos
I doubt it ๐
Lolz yeah
I have delt with a few Afrikaners here and there and more South African English
๐
Apparently there was a South African couple that managed to get refugee status in America, though they went through Mexico to get into America
Granted those two sides of the story are very simular.
@SilverAndJade Oh?
Well feel free to DM me @SilverAndJade or @Raitisan I would like to hear more perspectives and experiances.
Sure ๐
Aw look. I looked up Google bias using DuckDuckGo and I found this https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/dec/04/google-facebook-anti-conservative-bias-claims
Basically saying what I said
You can fix this by using https://www.startpage.com
It removes your user history by making your search an anonymous blank slate.
@Ranko The video you posted ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uc6QxD2_yQw ) is a good example of pro-feminist analysis of media produced mostly by pro-feminists (read: hollywood).
He can point out rape jokes against males is toxic masculinity because directors are mostly male (especially directors who include male-on-male rape jokes), ignoring that they are also feminists (because they come from Hollywood). Also, later in the commentary, he switches victimhood of prisonrape away from men, to "transwomen", i.e when men are victimized, it's still misogyny (even though in reality straight men get raped more brutally than bitch boys who partake in feminine role voluntarily).
The reviewer does however promise a follow-up of tropes about female predators, but considering how much in-line with feminist viewpoint the first part was, I'm curious how hell tackle the other half... of if he'll tackle it at all and used "handled in another video" as an excuse to not touch it as all, since "dealing separately" is feminist codeword for not dealing with it at all.
I wouldn't necessarily call prison rape jokes inherently toxic either, considering comedy can be the only way to deal with tragedy, be it for the teller or the audience. And prison rape jokes using falsely accused as the one in threat of being raped can be critique rather than approval of prison rape phenomenon. I cannot really comment on how ubiquitous people who have been raped in jail is among general male populace is, but I do know that USA has the highest prison population per capita, combined with high population in general, leading to millions of active inmates in addition to all the ones who served their time...
...and that USA is one of the places where male-on-male rape is seen as part of the justice system (where as in other second and third world countries, prison guard brutality replaces it).
And prison guard brutality would probably be closer to being actual justice, as they'd be motivated in brutalizing the trouble makers for making their job harder. The system where the troublemakers rape and punish the weak, is inverse of justice. The worst of punished don't get extra punishment from being raped: the get reward by getting to rape people.
So basically, congrats: North Korea has more justice than USA.
**WHAT! It was that Jonathan MacIntosh all the time?** No wonder everything felt like pushing the blame away from Hollywood, and onto evil comedians, as well as pushing male victimization away and onto "transwomen". Also, no actual critique of female predator will come, unless MacIntosh will call out as these portrayals in the media being false as *real women don't rape*.
Also noteworthy that he has viewerbase half of Sargon, despite being just a sidekick of Sarkeesian, and 97% approval rating on the video. Meanwhile "feminism is dead, anti-feminists are cringe" say majority of anti-feminists themselves.
Feminism is well and alive.
Fewer women will use the label, but that doesn't mean that the culture is any less gynocentric.
The erosion of due process is one example among many of how this crazy train simply has no brakes.
Yeah. You can tout all the feminist talking points (just avoiding or reducing number of callouts to "feminism", "misogyny" or "toxic masculinity" directly) and probably around 97% would agree with it.
In surveys measuring support for on the face discriminatory measures, in favor of women, men usually support the measure 55% and women 85%.
Most people are complete hypocrites when it comes to gender equality.
The same sleight of hand that is used in economic debate, in support of socialism, is used when it comes to gender equality. What these people mean is gender equity, not gender equality.
Except that they whilst abandoning equality under the law for equity of outcome, they aren't consistent on even that. Otherwise they would not just demand female draft but demand equalization of combat deaths. And they would force women to die at work, etc.
Mornin neanderthals. What did we get wrong today
@whiic implies that people should only be equal under the law rather than have equal outcome.
Did you know that suicide rates, homelessness and drop out rates are higher for men. There is no legal discrimination. No written law that causes this. Yet MRAs always complaining about equality of outcome.
So when you complain about feminism but sympathize with men, most people would conclude that you are a beta male mysogonist. This is why society does not take you seriously. Not some SJW conspiracy or whatever.
> implies that women should be executed to obtain equal outcome
Wow that was easy. Literally the first post I saw fucked up. No scrolling up necessary. Alright I'm out. See you later tonight neanderthals
You cannot have the cake and eat it too, AOC. Women need to face the execution squad if you want equal outcome.
Life expectancy gap need to be corrected if under equality of outcome model.
The problem isnt that men need more legal protections. They are pointing out how men are facing huge issues, but no one takes them seriously/ they are ignored. :p
Agreed.
If any woman outlives the male average for her location, she should be euthanized.
It can be rounded up to her nearest birthday, though. We're not inhumane.
Im guesing the aoc person is nerdy b gone?
Also fuck both sexes. They are both doing shit wrong and i forgot to look up somalia and ireland
So when I was watching Battle Angel Alita the screened a captain marvel trailer. My first thought was that the female authority figure was made to resemble the lefts perception of Hillary Clinton. Or am I wrong?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tkSuLa3o_5A at the 43 second mark
Sounds kinda like hillary
26,854 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 100/108
| Next