Message from @Raitisan
Discord ID: 546929705916432384
yeah send me that link
I'm done here, This isn't even an argument for me, This is a test to make sure you read what you post
I read all your shit then prove it wrong
just did 😍
And the fact that you refuse to accept any other personal experiences means that you will not even listen to anything people tell you.
You know what you haven't proven wrong?
My claims that you don't read your own articles
@mikeflarkin let's go over some of the more relevant points on your article here
People share their experiences... So take it with a grain of salt
The only point relevant to this discussion is 8. The search engine blacklist.
someone still is a racist
who is it?
Even the "Left" is complaining about censorship https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2017/09/19/goog-s19.html
And Rightwing sites complain of being censored https://www.thenewamerican.com/tech/computers/item/26021-how-google-censors-the-new-american-and-other-conservatives
Axel Springer is not conservative. It also says you have to violate guidelines which says nothing about conservatives being banned. They also scolded JC Penny for trying to game their system. e-Ventures got removed from the list compleatley.
So nothing here is evidence that conservatives in particular were altered in page ranking let alone cencored
There is a link to Aeon so let me just read that real quick
Can you deny it?
Anyone here familiar with the Black Swan myth?
*HAVE YOU LEARN TO CODE?*
The story goes that a sailor came ashore after a time at sea and spotted a teacher giving a lecture on birds by the docks. The sailor waited and after the class asked the professor if he knew about birds. The professor told him he knew every bird... The sailor asks what the name is for a swan that is black. The professor replies that there are no black swans. The sailor tells him there is. The professor opens his book and shows there is not entry for black swans.
The point of the story is that the sailors had seen it for themselves while the academic hadn't.
So one of your articles led to an Aeon article which outlined how the bias ACTUALLY works. https://aeon.co/essays/how-the-internet-flips-elections-and-alters-our-thoughts
Google stimulates confirmation bias. Which means YOU can use it and get results YOU want. Consider that this was written in 2016 and the more recent GDPR allows your to request your own information despite what the article states
That's why I read a collection of articles rather than just the first one
Google white family you turd
Send me the third picture
right now
The SEME experiment run was based on political candidates rather than factual issues.
<:NPC:500042527231967262>
Have you heard of the Shirts vs Skin color experiment?
nope