Good way to make finding a new job impossible

Someone who collects a paycheck based on diversity? Wouldn't that be more money for the company if they got rid of that stupid shit?

What a pathetic outlook.

Sometimes life is pathetic

Bret Weinstein disagrees with all of you.

Schedrevka isn't necessarily wrong.

Nah, companies see it as PR investment...

The challenge is that you'd have to provide cover for change.

Not everyone is fit to be a Bret Weinstein.

I'm sure that will do GREAT things for office dynamics and won't backfire in any way. "Hey, Jan in the diversity office shouldn't have her job because I say so. Here's my petition." You look like the asshole then.

Senny is right.

Right.

I wish that weren't the case. I really do.

@Senny the diversity shit is bigger than that though

Not everyone is fit for scruples.

And trying to hold everyone to your purity test isn't going to fix that.

the law firm i work for said that a major bank we do business with said they will not give loans or some shit to companies who aren't diverse

Man, all this is proving is that moral smugness and superiority and purity complexes are just as annoying from people whose principles I agree with as those I don't

Bret Weinstein is a guy who matters. In truth you're probably not a vulnerable as you'd think if you went full Weinstein, but there is defniitely costs.

@Tits McGee I'm convinced.

I think it's key to realize there is a reason left wing organizations usually sign off "in solidarity"

They cover each other in their actions.

That's the key. If one person quits, it doesn't matter. If a whole division quits, it does.

@pratel exactly

But you'd need to have solid reason that the whole division would revolt.

You are being an ass about this, Scribblehatch. We all in principle agree with you. You're the one saying we're not fitting your moral standards that I'm sure you totally live up to yourself and aren't being hypocritical about in any way.

Hold on, what's the deal?

I told you I was convinced.

No bully.

Is it racism if you prefer hiring your own race?

I'd say so.

yup

If you're steering into it with that thought in mind, yes.

Because the argument comes, if all things are equal, and you got a black and an asian, i would hire an asian moreso

@Zuihou yes

but

only if you hired because of race

Shouldn’t matter what race they are. It’s not a factor of work ethic

otherwise if that person was more qualified then no not racist

Is it racism to call for genocide, BUT please keep in mind that this race is weeaboos

@Crimsom but if all things equal

if they are equally capable, that's different

No two people are alike.

Well that's what i mean

Because liberal threw this at me

Don't use edge cases that have almost no real life applications.

then you go by who you like more

This is the main problem of the left today.

I said i would hire an asian over black if all things equal

if you can't decide then flip a coin rather than go by appearance

Hiring based on how it will look, instead of how it will BE, is always fucked up.

It's bias for sure but I wouldn't see it as that bad as hiring purely on race basis

I have no patience to pretend otherwise.

Because at that point, it is due to who would interact with me more xD

Now, if they can speak chinese and like anime, then whoever i can talk more with xD

But then again... if their qualifications are all equal

👌

If all things are equal (Which is probably 1 in 5000 at the most) go by the culture you think they're from. Culture largely determines what people will have as a work ethic.

it's not what you know it's who you know

and rike

discriminating on the basis of liking anime or not is pure and moral

People like to call nepotism 'networking' these days.

Anime>no anime

And get gravely offended you point it out.

@Senny well i got racist because i wont hire black over asian if all things equal

Which is in of itself racist xD

But he circled around his own question

It's because you're focusing upon their skin color with the absence of information, rather than culture.

Because i called him out on it also

no anime > trash anime

@Beemann blasphemer. a trash waifu > no waifu

Bad is worse than none.

@Maw yes, because it all things equal you are not saying the other is inferior

your're waifu a shit

well it can be called racist but it's more racial bias.. it's actually observed phenomenon in hiring, I won't say either is in the right there

I grew up being taught racism is stereotypes based on skin colour/immutable assets.

( if all things equal )

So, flip a coin?

Pretty much

People should be allowed to show up for interviews in hazmat suits.

No I'd go and see what their interests are. I will hire a person wearing a Kippah over hiring someone wearing their Alpha Zeta Omega frat T-Shirt.

Well i know i have bias, but if one is asian and is an idiot, and the other is black and is smart. I would pick the black person xD

If their qualifications are equal.

THAT'S FRATERNITY BIAS REEE

DUDEBRO BIAS

If you have two perfectly equal candidates (which never happens anyway) then yeah, flip a coin. The problem is more realistic if you have one with more work experience but with an abrasive personality that might affect your other employees versus one who you know would get along better at the office but is less qualified.

Well that is another factor, how is their teamwork

always the one who won't stir up shit imho even if he's slightly worse

imho

What if your competition gets the better candidate though?

Interviews and resumes are horsehit anyway.

Really, the idea of two equal people is ridiculous.

^^

i don't care, potentional troubles can hinder more than that one employee being slightly less cpaable

And isn't worth theorizing anyway.

Everyone is encouraged to lie on them.

He probably has a job somewhere and people are sharing this around his workplace xD