Message from @Tits McGee

Discord ID: 477992882918391818


2018-08-12 00:10:32 UTC  

Schedrevka isn't necessarily wrong.

2018-08-12 00:10:34 UTC  

Nah, companies see it as PR investment...

2018-08-12 00:10:45 UTC  

The challenge is that you'd have to provide cover for change.

2018-08-12 00:10:52 UTC  

Not everyone is fit to be a Bret Weinstein.

2018-08-12 00:10:56 UTC  

I'm sure that will do GREAT things for office dynamics and won't backfire in any way. "Hey, Jan in the diversity office shouldn't have her job because I say so. Here's my petition." You look like the asshole then.

2018-08-12 00:10:57 UTC  

Senny is right.

2018-08-12 00:10:57 UTC  

Right.

2018-08-12 00:10:58 UTC  

I wish that weren't the case. I really do.

2018-08-12 00:11:08 UTC  

@Senny the diversity shit is bigger than that though

2018-08-12 00:11:11 UTC  

Not everyone is fit for scruples.

2018-08-12 00:11:28 UTC  

And trying to hold everyone to your purity test isn't going to fix that.

2018-08-12 00:11:36 UTC  

the law firm i work for said that a major bank we do business with said they will not give loans or some shit to companies who aren't diverse

2018-08-12 00:11:42 UTC  

Man, all this is proving is that moral smugness and superiority and purity complexes are just as annoying from people whose principles I agree with as those I don't

2018-08-12 00:11:51 UTC  

Bret Weinstein is a guy who matters. In truth you're probably not a vulnerable as you'd think if you went full Weinstein, but there is defniitely costs.

2018-08-12 00:12:08 UTC  

@Tits McGee I'm convinced.

2018-08-12 00:12:09 UTC  

I think it's key to realize there is a reason left wing organizations usually sign off "in solidarity"

2018-08-12 00:12:15 UTC  

They cover each other in their actions.

2018-08-12 00:12:35 UTC  

That's the key. If one person quits, it doesn't matter. If a whole division quits, it does.

2018-08-12 00:12:39 UTC  

@pratel exactly

2018-08-12 00:12:47 UTC  

But you'd need to have solid reason that the whole division would revolt.

2018-08-12 00:13:03 UTC  

You are being an ass about this, Scribblehatch. We all in principle agree with you. You're the one saying we're not fitting your moral standards that I'm sure you totally live up to yourself and aren't being hypocritical about in any way.

2018-08-12 00:13:14 UTC  

Hold on, what's the deal?

2018-08-12 00:13:18 UTC  

I told you I was convinced.

2018-08-12 00:13:37 UTC  

No bully.

2018-08-12 00:13:43 UTC  

Is it racism if you prefer hiring your own race?

2018-08-12 00:13:57 UTC  

I'd say so.

2018-08-12 00:14:10 UTC  

yup

2018-08-12 00:14:20 UTC  

If you're steering into it with that thought in mind, yes.

2018-08-12 00:14:22 UTC  

Because the argument comes, if all things are equal, and you got a black and an asian, i would hire an asian moreso

2018-08-12 00:14:23 UTC  
2018-08-12 00:14:25 UTC  

but

2018-08-12 00:14:34 UTC  

only if you hired because of race

2018-08-12 00:14:35 UTC  

Shouldn’t matter what race they are. It’s not a factor of work ethic

2018-08-12 00:14:46 UTC  

otherwise if that person was more qualified then no not racist

2018-08-12 00:14:48 UTC  

Is it racism to call for genocide, BUT please keep in mind that this race is weeaboos

2018-08-12 00:14:50 UTC  

@Crimsom but if all things equal

2018-08-12 00:15:04 UTC  

if they are equally capable, that's different

2018-08-12 00:15:09 UTC  

No two people are alike.

2018-08-12 00:15:14 UTC  

Well that's what i mean

2018-08-12 00:15:21 UTC  

Because liberal threw this at me

2018-08-12 00:15:23 UTC  

Don't use edge cases that have almost no real life applications.