it's not what you know it's who you know

and rike

discriminating on the basis of liking anime or not is pure and moral

People like to call nepotism 'networking' these days.

Anime>no anime

And get gravely offended you point it out.

@Senny well i got racist because i wont hire black over asian if all things equal

Which is in of itself racist xD

But he circled around his own question

It's because you're focusing upon their skin color with the absence of information, rather than culture.

Because i called him out on it also

no anime > trash anime

@Beemann blasphemer. a trash waifu > no waifu

Bad is worse than none.

@Maw yes, because it all things equal you are not saying the other is inferior

your're waifu a shit

well it can be called racist but it's more racial bias.. it's actually observed phenomenon in hiring, I won't say either is in the right there

I grew up being taught racism is stereotypes based on skin colour/immutable assets.

( if all things equal )

So, flip a coin?

Pretty much

People should be allowed to show up for interviews in hazmat suits.

No I'd go and see what their interests are. I will hire a person wearing a Kippah over hiring someone wearing their Alpha Zeta Omega frat T-Shirt.

Well i know i have bias, but if one is asian and is an idiot, and the other is black and is smart. I would pick the black person xD

If their qualifications are equal.

THAT'S FRATERNITY BIAS REEE

DUDEBRO BIAS

If you have two perfectly equal candidates (which never happens anyway) then yeah, flip a coin. The problem is more realistic if you have one with more work experience but with an abrasive personality that might affect your other employees versus one who you know would get along better at the office but is less qualified.

Well that is another factor, how is their teamwork

always the one who won't stir up shit imho even if he's slightly worse

imho

What if your competition gets the better candidate though?

Interviews and resumes are horsehit anyway.

Really, the idea of two equal people is ridiculous.

^^

i don't care, potentional troubles can hinder more than that one employee being slightly less cpaable

And isn't worth theorizing anyway.

Everyone is encouraged to lie on them.

He probably has a job somewhere and people are sharing this around his workplace xD