or smething

But here's the thing grenade

it's on multiple seperate companies all at once

since some of those nations have hate-speech laws

this never happens

this feels so coordinated

it feels like he lost a legal battle recently or something

And do we have the man himself giving a statement?

I feel like all I know about Infowars comes from PJW himself

how could he? fox news?

https://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/news/2018/08/06/alex-jones-show-removed-other-infowars-content-services/912742002/

This is rather disturbing

it should be

I mean it wasnt too long ago CNN was passing charged questions regarding allowing Infowars to exist on their platforms

But on all of them at once?

This cant be a coincidence

it could be a coordinated mass flag campaign

not hard

Then again, youd need more than one discord or a few to do one this coordinated

And youd expect some of this to be revealed.

would you? its Jones. Its not a no one on the intern.

even tim isn't nearly as well known to normies.

it could be coordinated, or it could be several different companies all under pressure for a while to do something, and just waiting for someone else to pull the trigger

And they said Hate speech and they didtn give a specific post on that

because this has happened over a few weeks.

Thats basically one half of a kafkatrap

didnt Alex Jones get banned on fb for something else tho....

along with his youtube channels

he got banned from fb

not info wars specifially

well info wars is his so it would also get banned

by default

nope

because that is a company

And I disagree with PJW, it hasnt even started yet.

they banned him, but PJW was still allowed on

in otherwords

but jones couldn't post

The censorship is just them warming up

How do these companies not know how DIRE this reflects on them

well not on fb it isnt... on fb its just a page for his company.

"Hey other big companies. Let's all agree to this banning AT THE SAME TIME, OKAY? 8D"

if they ban him they have the right to ban any other account he started

I saw this on TD, grain of salt

oof

I think its them testing the waters

Basically do something, see the reaction

If reaction is very negative, put out a apology, and it will be like nothing happened

And while the internet does not forget. People do forget.

why do companies keep testing normies

Because normies are the majority

In comparison we are basically peopel who spend alot more time on the internet than the average person

there is a significant portion of the population who don't go with the progressive narrative.

And heres one issue

A majority of trump's userbase are not internet users.

seems to me like fb had valid reasons for banning him.. since its not his first offense

and most of those people, still have friends who are slightly farther left than them. and the train goes on until you get to the far left

keep pulling on the right without weakening the chains, all you do is pull everyone over

its their own potential financial suicide

which, i mean, i wouldn't be too said to see any of those companies go

well, maybe spotify

It's also not so much about him being banned, but banned by all those different companies at once

i highly doubt any of the companies are going anywhere from this

depends on each companies reasoning for banning him

fb has a valid reason to ban him

For all we know, its either automated due to mass flagging

Problem is, if that is valid, why havent they banned the other sites that say worse.

Sure, if its valid, ban IW

But if its being enforced selectively, now thats a problem

You either ban none or ban them all

Apple also has a valid reason. They all implemented "hate speech" policies to their platform

ToS are dangerous

and they have the right to ban whoever cuz the platforms are not public domain meaning free speech doesnt apply to them.

there are companies who update their ToS just to ban someone

Its.. also a contractual agreement made between two parties

I.. dont think his banning is the issue here.

lookin at you wizards

The issue is why other offenders are not being banned

because they arent as big as him....

The selective enforcement

and in such a huge spotlight

technically once you get so big, selective enforcement is your only way to go

because you require people to report

Then wouldnt that make the idea that it was a mass flag campaign more valid.

all these platforms are private companies and have the right to kick whoever they want off their platforms.

but people abuse the system

moderating is a clusterfuck

That private company defense ceases to work when they want to be a public utility.

there is no way to not selectively enforce things outside of out right ban anyone just off one report

and then you end up with no users

or so many alts there is no point in moderating

And its most likely not something automated.

doesnt make them a public forum still meaning free speech doesnt apply to them

it can be automated to a point, i.e. enough flags over the course of x time for x reason

Didnt tim say that youtube or facebook was using infowars as a trusted form for news

i don't think any of those companies want to be a public utility

do the ToS even define hate speech? Who is next?

not unless they want to be regulated to hell and back

A big account being deleted needs to be signed off 100% sure