then there will be no filtering

wow is this real? someone got a title IX because he asked for a fist bump and a selfie?

https://twitter.com/MoistCr1TiKaL/status/1023104602714107904?s=20

lol

That's next level of woke

that overwatch bit is pretty good 😛

> inb4 an unattractive person will dare to look at wamen

Is that girl ableist?

🤔

Yes

That some female/able privilege right there

Waaaaait... maybe she mixed up "fist bump" with "fisting" ?

I mean, how did he ask. He could have said "fist me" or "may I fist you". Leaving the bump out.

Easy mistake to make

It says he has limited vocabulary

So she's pushing this investigation because he's autistic

hold on, there is another factor here

if you can not behave in a socially acceptable manner, maybe the autist should not be there

To be fair he may have tried to fist bump her anus for all we know.

Or her boob

Or her mouth

or her fist?

@>Cytos, de lieve goede synth disgusting

But seriously if that story is indeed how the article presents it he should sue the university for discrimination on the grounds of disability.

He could choose disability or just lack of due process

Oh it's exactly what it presents itself as

She also further accused the guy of sexual assault

I've noticed actually that the disabled are waaaaay down in the progressive stack. They don't really have a lobby. There's no equivalent of feminism for disabled people.

People who want to "save" or "reclaim" feminism frustrate me so much

Feminism isn't helping anybody

These left wing activists tend to add "ableism" into their word soup but you're right. They don't actually care. It's only about power

even the coffeeshop feminists are virtue signalling cunts who are good for nothing

No shit, @Deleted User a movement for a cause that was long acheived does not do any good

I like people like Professor Hoff sommers, don't get me wrong. But atleast she understands that the movement is now a toxic ideology

Coffee shop feminists is a good way to put it. We call them the chattering classes or the chateratti. They live such sheltered and privileged lives that they have the time to sit around and moan about trivialities.

I guess we need an anti-slavery movement too

It's a similar descriptor as Champagne Socialist

"We must reclaim feminism from these misandrist sjws."

Like, please no

oooooh bbc.... https://twitter.com/BBC/status/1023237421650141184?s=20

If you actually have issues you want to fight for, why do you need this ideology?

I don't

I just call all kids "smug little idiots"

What's the point?

Yeah that was posted above wacka. Crazy propaganda.

@Deleted User Tribalism is easier and feels nice

I can't believe this propaganda is being publicly funded

Like, are the imams are gonna go "Oh? You call yourself *feminist*? NO MORE CUTTING CLITS OFF PEOPLE"

@Dan V Exactly. That part of it infuriates me.

"SEND THOSE GIRLS TO SCHOOL NOW A ***FEMINIST*** IS SAYING IT"

I wonder how many people they actually had in there... just to pick like.. 3 people to say "HA YOU'RE STEREOTYPING!!!"

@Sarah Jessica Farter if Brits were given a choice as to whether or not to fund the BBC, it would collapse

Why even try to rally for a change yourself, when you can engage in slacktivism, mob-harass people out of jobs and autistically screech from the very comfort of your couch with a cheescake?

Actually making a difference is hard work

And they ain't got no time for dat

technically you do have a choice on whether to pay the bbc

@Uksio millenials don't have time for work. Too much to be outraged about

Personally I'm not against publicly-funded media as a concept but the BBC's current bias is completely rotten.

You know, I should start writing a script about whether feminism needs to be reclaimed

you only pay it if you watch live broadcast tv

or recorded bbc shows

@wacka I did not know that. Thanks!

(unless its on netflix)

netflix has dr who and sherlock anyway...

@Sarah Jessica Farter If the people who are in charge of directing where the tax money goes to are corrupted, so will ever media company they're responsible for

Who cares Sherlock sucks

and Dr Who isn't as interesting anymore

The problem is that a lot of people like the wildlife documentaries for example that BBC creates so its actually still quite popular even though its news section is now Buzzfeed on steroids.

Fun fact: Sherlock didn't use deductive reasoning

@Deleted User Dr Who is a wahmen now. It is defacto more interesting

SHERLOCK WAS TURNED INTO A FUCKING ACTION HERO

WHO

FUCKING

CARES

@Uksio inductive reasoning?

@Dan V correct

😀

@Uksio Doesn't he correct watson on that

this was promoted in my feed... what are they trying to tell me .. I have never seen a single episode 😛 https://twitter.com/BBCNews/status/1022507175820910593?s=20

I don't know. I haven't watched Sherlock nor am I familiar with the literature

There was a story where it starts out with Sherlock criticising watson for mislabeling hhis reasoning tactics

and watson gets angry

@wacka 😂 😂 😂 I saw that headline a day or two ago also! I didnt click on it though.

In fact the "idiot policemen" in Doyle's story actually use a flawed deduction all the time, and then Sherlock corrects them with his flawless induction from evidence

Sherlock repeatedly says in the series he wanted to write a textbook on his methods

The story is no worse with that mixup anyhow

Also it is a bit tired by now

Someone needs to write a continuation with new Sherlock story arcs

House MD is the closest we've got to sherlock

@Uksio Check out House of silk

@wacka yeah but if there's going to be too many black people, then they would complain that they're portraying black people as promiscuous and irresponsible

it's a new sherlock story

I have practicing medics as friends

They frequently laugh at Dr.House

No shit

it's a TV Show

They get a lot of stuff wrong there

Who cares

The show is more about house

and his character