general

Discord ID: 463054787336732683


845,392 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev | Page 237/8454 | Next

2018-07-17 14:35:47 UTC

Nukes would cause as many or more.

2018-07-17 14:35:47 UTC

@Grenade123 How about people driving when it hits

2018-07-17 14:35:58 UTC

or the airplanes

2018-07-17 14:36:00 UTC

Breaks should still work

2018-07-17 14:36:05 UTC

or the life support

2018-07-17 14:36:08 UTC

lol hospitals would get fucked

2018-07-17 14:36:11 UTC

I think he means the EMP itself wont kill

2018-07-17 14:36:18 UTC

Only the lack of electricity after

2018-07-17 14:36:19 UTC

EMP's don't cause long term environmental effects (no fallout).

2018-07-17 14:36:19 UTC

Pacemakers

2018-07-17 14:36:31 UTC

who cares about the environment?

2018-07-17 14:36:33 UTC

thats a human problem

2018-07-17 14:36:35 UTC

ayyy darwinism yayaya

2018-07-17 14:36:43 UTC

It's an everything problem.

2018-07-17 14:36:45 UTC

Everyone with a pacemaker would die

2018-07-17 14:36:52 UTC

naw, the earth doesn't care

2018-07-17 14:36:59 UTC

>.>

2018-07-17 14:37:09 UTC

animals might care but i'm not saying it would solve animal problems

2018-07-17 14:37:12 UTC

just human ones

2018-07-17 14:37:22 UTC

ill be fucking glad i have an acoustic guitar even if that would be the very least of my problems XD

2018-07-17 14:37:32 UTC

*head desk*

2018-07-17 14:37:45 UTC

you are missing the joke

2018-07-17 14:37:59 UTC

No I get the joke.

2018-07-17 14:38:08 UTC

It's just not a good one.

2018-07-17 14:38:17 UTC

And you're missing my point.

2018-07-17 14:38:33 UTC

Nukes, are dirty, expenisve and not that effective.

2018-07-17 14:39:03 UTC

More effective just existing than using them Id say

2018-07-17 14:39:10 UTC

Assuming effectiveness at preventing conflict

2018-07-17 14:39:14 UTC

EMPs are cheap, clean, and more effective for the effort.

2018-07-17 14:39:38 UTC

depends on the definition of effective.

2018-07-17 14:39:43 UTC

No, I'm talking about massive disrubtion to human civilization.

2018-07-17 14:39:44 UTC

mind you military comms would get fucked

2018-07-17 14:39:51 UTC

Im talking the opposite really.

2018-07-17 14:39:54 UTC

but theyd still be able to operate oldschool

2018-07-17 14:39:59 UTC

won't kill all humans, just set us back several thousand years.

2018-07-17 14:40:03 UTC

CARRIER PIDGEON STYLE

2018-07-17 14:40:07 UTC

Niether will nukes.

2018-07-17 14:40:19 UTC

Nukes won't kill all humans.

2018-07-17 14:40:50 UTC

still plenty will live. nukes on the other hand, them seem pretty good at blowing shit up. and we already have a lot of them. just make a dot matrix of the world. Maybe a few bunker busters before hand to clean out the caves

2018-07-17 14:41:04 UTC

radiation will do the rest over time, if we miss people

2018-07-17 14:41:25 UTC

The US isn't going to go on a misanthropic killing spree either.

2018-07-17 14:41:25 UTC

So why are you guys talking bout killing everyone?

2018-07-17 14:41:36 UTC

wai tthough wouldnt an EMP destabilise all teh nuclear reactors??

2018-07-17 14:41:37 UTC

Sounds like nihilism and thats for edgy bois.

2018-07-17 14:41:41 UTC

Almost makes you wish for a nuclear winter...

2018-07-17 14:41:44 UTC

who said the US? naw, everyone! global cure for human problems

2018-07-17 14:41:50 UTC

...

2018-07-17 14:41:59 UTC

get russia in on the deal

2018-07-17 14:42:01 UTC

china

2018-07-17 14:42:03 UTC

its perfect

2018-07-17 14:42:23 UTC

inbf people forget NZ exists and it ends up the last country in existance

2018-07-17 14:42:24 UTC

>not using your nukes to propel spaceships

2018-07-17 14:42:39 UTC

What

2018-07-17 14:42:41 UTC

OOoooh. I like that. A parting gift.

2018-07-17 14:42:49 UTC

how will nukes propel spaceships

2018-07-17 14:42:52 UTC

Project Orion

2018-07-17 14:42:58 UTC

maybe some politicians left. maybe. So they can look at their good work with no way to make food, or clear water

2018-07-17 14:43:06 UTC

Nuclear blasts in space used to propel a shuttle forward

2018-07-17 14:43:19 UTC

@GingaBomber My point was Nihilistic it was that if someone did want to destroy humanity, if that's their goal, an EMP is a much more likely cause.

2018-07-17 14:43:35 UTC

Id say a disease is more effective

2018-07-17 14:43:41 UTC

3-6 small nukes in high orbit around the globe.

2018-07-17 14:43:43 UTC

Case closed

2018-07-17 14:43:47 UTC

I think we've just devolved into pure shitposting here.

2018-07-17 14:43:49 UTC

The most ridiculous and cool space exploration idea ever

2018-07-17 14:44:06 UTC

No, disease has to spread via travel and you can close boarders.

2018-07-17 14:44:15 UTC

Project Orion is 0% shitpost. The issue is that you wouldnt launch with it obviously

2018-07-17 14:44:28 UTC
2018-07-17 14:44:32 UTC

So you'd still need to get the relevant shuttle into space to start with, and your math has to be spot on

2018-07-17 14:45:03 UTC

Or you've either nuked your pilots or stranded them

2018-07-17 14:45:05 UTC

Animals?

2018-07-17 14:45:15 UTC

Birds migrate, food sources can be contaminated

2018-07-17 14:45:24 UTC

Give it a ridiculously long incubation

2018-07-17 14:45:37 UTC

Put it in a coconut and have swallows carry it

2018-07-17 14:45:47 UTC

the problem is humans are pretty hearty

2018-07-17 14:45:48 UTC

African, or european?

2018-07-17 14:46:03 UTC

๐Ÿ‘Œ

2018-07-17 14:46:09 UTC

humans are like cockroaches

2018-07-17 14:46:20 UTC

I think the PC term is turks

2018-07-17 14:46:45 UTC

Zing.

2018-07-17 14:48:54 UTC

all this to say... if there was a civil war in the US it would..... not be fun

2018-07-17 14:49:12 UTC

For the world as well

2018-07-17 14:49:18 UTC

I dont know how the world will react to it

2018-07-17 14:49:24 UTC

idk, russia would probably have a good time

2018-07-17 14:49:27 UTC

This is the best nickname possible for Ben Shapiro

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/463054787336732683/468791347348766722/unknown.png

2018-07-17 14:49:28 UTC

china maybe too

2018-07-17 14:49:38 UTC

lmao

2018-07-17 14:49:38 UTC

I think china will have a better time

2018-07-17 14:49:51 UTC

idk, don't we make a good part of their exports?

2018-07-17 14:50:08 UTC

might not tbe the best for their economy if we imploded

2018-07-17 14:50:08 UTC

Id say they will be in the best place to start wars

2018-07-17 14:50:21 UTC

They already have the industrial power and military power.

2018-07-17 14:50:33 UTC

yeah i think its in chinas best interest that this DOESNT happen

2018-07-17 14:50:48 UTC

But even the average person there does not want war at all

2018-07-17 14:51:02 UTC

So id say they will also try their best to prevent a US civil war as well

2018-07-17 14:51:04 UTC

i wonder how many parts in our current military hardware come in part from china

2018-07-17 14:53:24 UTC

the broken kind

2018-07-17 14:53:44 UTC

probably alot there are for sure some of the multinational tech corporatons based out of there

2018-07-17 14:54:32 UTC

I mean, strange as well

2018-07-17 14:54:35 UTC

But this may pass

2018-07-17 14:54:48 UTC

They kicked up a fuss about Trump meeting Kim

845,392 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev | Page 237/8454 | Next