I think he means the EMP itself wont kill

Only the lack of electricity after

EMP's don't cause long term environmental effects (no fallout).

Pacemakers

who cares about the environment?

thats a human problem

ayyy darwinism yayaya

It's an everything problem.

Everyone with a pacemaker would die

naw, the earth doesn't care

>.>

animals might care but i'm not saying it would solve animal problems

just human ones

ill be fucking glad i have an acoustic guitar even if that would be the very least of my problems XD

*head desk*

you are missing the joke

No I get the joke.

It's just not a good one.

And you're missing my point.

Nukes, are dirty, expenisve and not that effective.

More effective just existing than using them Id say

Assuming effectiveness at preventing conflict

EMPs are cheap, clean, and more effective for the effort.

depends on the definition of effective.

No, I'm talking about massive disrubtion to human civilization.

mind you military comms would get fucked

Im talking the opposite really.

but theyd still be able to operate oldschool

won't kill all humans, just set us back several thousand years.

CARRIER PIDGEON STYLE

Niether will nukes.

Nukes won't kill all humans.

still plenty will live. nukes on the other hand, them seem pretty good at blowing shit up. and we already have a lot of them. just make a dot matrix of the world. Maybe a few bunker busters before hand to clean out the caves

radiation will do the rest over time, if we miss people

The US isn't going to go on a misanthropic killing spree either.

So why are you guys talking bout killing everyone?

wai tthough wouldnt an EMP destabilise all teh nuclear reactors??

Sounds like nihilism and thats for edgy bois.

Almost makes you wish for a nuclear winter...

who said the US? naw, everyone! global cure for human problems

...