why do you say that

Don't know. It's fun to watch him redpill though.

redpilling non lefties

i remember i first heard of him when i was into BLM

finding out the true stories behind a lot of those deaths really was the biggest redpill for me

intially

Being that progressives follow their ideology with religious fervor, and are so so intent on rules and what they consider morality, i'd say thats puritanical

Absolutely!

but the question was if his fans are progressives

Its exactly as Monroe drew it up in his tweet. its religion through and through. oldest story told.

oh, well i'm sure there are a few.

yeah that notgayjared tweet sums it up

Probably some of them.

probably more center than anything. and a few far rights i know cuz you see them in the comments bitching at Tim for not being hard enough lol

i figure their are a bunch of lefties from his blm and occupy stuff but have abandonded ship long ago

With how frustrated Tim's got via his new Timcast channel i'm surprised those lefties have stayed. Or maybe they just don't watch the second channel's stuff

there are some lefties that hang out here and he's said he has lefty friends who watch his videos

Timcast, in the past 4 months, has shot up to 80k subs on youtube. I'd say that channel probably has a much higher ratio of conservative-leaning subs.

yeah honestly have been watching cast more than pool

Well, im not one of them

Conservatives, that is

But his Tim Pool channel isn't slouching either. Made about 50k subs during that time probably because of the reach his second channel's made, but i'd say the primary channel is more left.

i wouldnt consider myself conservative either but that is besides his point

radical alt-centrists rise up

Generaly opposed to typical social justice BS seems common, but thats precisly not conservative most of the time

Its more common sensiscal, but the modern idea of conservatives has been blended with libertarianism. Conservatives just 20 years ago were bible thumping patriots.

Take me for example. I disagree with the left about trannies changing the restroom they use. Not becouse i dont want trannies in the womens restroom but becouse there BEING a womans restroom is discriminatory against all men, not just trannies. Its like wed have said back in the day "only people making an effort to look white like michael jackson get in the white restroom, but we are keeping the seperate restrooms"

Not saying racial segregation was bad, even. I dont care much about either, but it is the same.

You either support segregation or you dont

i feel like there is still the seperation of the groups tho

idk maybe conservative is now being used for more than what it was

Segregation didn't need to be a thing. It was bad legislation based on the fears of the time. Morality aside, it was a shit program.

@zero_consequences and i dont see the female only restrooms feminists demanded in any different way

lol someone posted a pic of "all gender" bathroom next to "female" bathroom

Well thats bullshit

Though, to be fair

Up until about 40 years ago, Zig, democrats still followed the very Southern democrat way of thinking. til they saw more votes with minorities and labor, both things they've abandoned but people haven't noticed and just keep voting

The male bathroom was allways an all gender bathroom. Nobdody would complain if a woman came in and used it. Just like likely noone wouldve complained about a white using the black bathroom

I for one dont see why there should be any bathroom thats not for all genders

yeah

Perhaps the male/female bathroom thing is based on an old convention. Keeping the sexes separate and certain things mysterious and silent, as nobody wanted to know. I don't think there's a change in people wanting to know what the other sex does in the shitter, they just feel this is a good place to start for equity.

Well, its not like there are many people that do see it the way i do, either

So you change the sign, but that doesn't change the culture.

I for one grew up in the scouts and we didnt dig a seperate hole to shit in for the girls

did either of you see the new ant man

Women are going to complain that guys farts stink up the joint, and guys are gonna be like "wtf" if they see a bloody tampon lying around. But single bathrooms would fix the trans issue... but its an issue that effects less than .03% of the American public. Is it even an issue the government should concern itself with--federally, or, municipally?

girl farts smell better bc science

girls don't fart i hear.

no cuz all the shit just comes out of their mouths

:dab:

Nice.

@zero_consequences my point is, it affects not just .03%

It affects at least nearly 50%

All men are excluded from female only restrooms. In theory vice versa, too, though thats not as enforced

But it never mattered, because there were always two bathrooms.

Mens, and womens.

No, that wasnt allways the case

And it having been allways the case wouldnt be an argument, either

The fact that there's a womans bathroom and a general use bathroom/mens just means males are default. So I don't see where the issue is. And it was men/women bathroom for a looong time. Sure maybe 80 years ago everyone used the same room, aside from different races. But lets not get stuck on semantics.

I dont see it as a big issue, either, but it clearly is a symptom of the misandry so common in the human species

Youll notice the ones opposed to the lefts fixation on trannies dont say "we dont want trannies in the ladies room" they say "we dont want MEN in the ladies room"

Theres misandry and misogyny, thats the nature of hate. We both love and hate eachother

I dont believe misogyny is a thing tbh

Sure, some disturbed individuals may be misogynistic

On a societal level never has been a thing

If you believe misandry is a thing then it's only common sense its reciprocated.

Hehe yeah if everything was equal, yes.

But we know for a fact that women have an ingroup bias for other women whereas men actualy ALSO prefer women.

I'm not using the definition of misogyny that third-wave feminists use, i'm using it like a form of chauvinism. There are elements there.

Sure, chauvinism exists. It doesnt mean you *hate* women i dont think if you are a chauvinist though

No, it isn't just about hate. It's about a lack of respect and trust for a group of people.

Trust me I know, I feel that for women in the general sense lol. But some women knock me on my ass and I gotta respect em.

Let me say this, there havent been many authors advocating for killing women and cutting them up which are respected decades later

*glances at the SCUM-Manifesto*

Or groups of men sittign in front of a camera on TV laughing about how a guy mutilated a girls genitals

Doesnt happen

True. Just like in Crowder's change my mind ep posted today, the definition of a culture is tolerance and encouragement to do something. if you mean that in our society that we aren't encouraged to hate women i'd say thats true. Individual people certainly can feel that but it isn't a part of the culture

yes, I saw the Crowder change my mind ... the hysterical woman sure wore here rape like a badge of honor, to give herself credibility. I wonder ...

I would argue that thats a human universal tbh. Purely from a biological standpoint, we are a gynocentric species based on how our reproduction works and our psychology evolved accordingly

We are very critical of women, as we are with men. But we're also fighting with the ghost of old media.. male-dominated pop culture which was so-dominated because it was marketed to males more than women, them being the breadwinners.

So an argument can't really be won because any point made today can be crushed by the inequality of the sins of our fathers

Well, i dont actualy think women were ever opressed

Did individual women have problems with how things were run? Yes.

Typicly, however, this was informed by what women by in large wanted

I can see how they'd see themselves as oppressed. Like how we view Communist China and their control over their citizens. Women had very strict cultural guidelines. Men did too, of course, as a result of responsibility

Under sharia, its typicly the mother that makes the choice about what to do with her childrens genitals (and muslim men oppose FGM in larger numbers than muslim women do btw). Hebrews, yes, married women of other tribes under threat of death - sounds misogynistic until you look at the fact that men and boys of those tribes had no alternative to death

Women couldnt get a credit card without a male cosigner but they also couldnt be held responsible for any debt (and they still could tell a store to bill her husband regardless if she was married)

And the man could also divorce her leaving her homeless and penniless if she did so.

So lets move past this.

Everyone got the shit end of the stick to some degree.

I dont think it was that easy to divorce back then. But yeah, its not relevant for today, it is when people claim history or even sharia are misogynistic, that kinda requires a look on both sides (technicly even that can only give you an inference, about the motivation for it youd have to ask them)

In any case, i need to catch myself some sleep

night

i wish tim was on here more

Women are dorks.

Flex to agree.

I love this so much

"If i dissappear, it was murder....
...In other news, clapping is banned in a university" -Tim Pool 2018

Indonesia is getting pounded

That ring of fire is a real bitch