Syria

Russia bitched out

we don't know that yet

They didn't retaliate? I wonder why? It's like we warned them beforehand

Oh they did

>competing with American force projection

Top

Kek

I seriously doubt they even gave that a serious thought

I'm still quite conflicted on what side to be on though

False flag can make a lot of sense

At the same time

I don't think Twitter people know more then the united states government lol

Did we hit anything bad?

doesn't look like it

Yeah fucking this strike up would be the only real consequence imo

And only in terms of optics

Nobody can do shit about us and they know it

So people are freaking out like last year and going hurr durr off the drumpf train

Yes

I do think trump literally did it to call Putins bluff

"We will retaliate"

Doesnt do shit

Cause you know you don't have a leg to stand on when it's time to do gangster shit

Fucking hell, I keep saying that it's theater and people still want the worst to happen

it's been not even 4 hours. don't count your money when you're sitting at the table

I'm speculating

But I have a good base I think

People don't really realize how stupidly OP our military is

They say they don't want any strikes but they've gotten used to wanting bad or expecting bad things to happen. It's like a dog that been tortured to the point where it won't react anymore

What we say goes and nobody can do jack shit about it

All they can do is whine

I bet Queen Ann went ballistic

This is a replay of last time like you said

Nothing will come of it

I'm not one to really trust Wictor, but if anything were to happen to Assad, you'd think he'd have an heir or some trusted people put in place in case shit went down.

Probably he knows shit is hot

And hes in the middle of it all

did everyone see Alex Jones' fake cry?

https://twitter.com/Some_BlackGuy/status/985023864752099330

Are people still going nuts?

What's the white pill channel for?

It's for any good stories

At this point there I don't see a reason for the white pill channel

Don't worry, there will be

The Count Dankula case is one of many, tyranny hasn't died it is just staggered .

Oh yeah, that fee is calculated. If he was jailed there would be protests. Very wise of the UK legal sytem. This will allow them to perpetuate their power.

This will get people to claim victory over crumbs

Right, even though it stupidly bad.

The bar is now set. This is what will get you find. Lgeal implications is there is something that will get you prision. and that is terrible.

I'm too drunk for this shit right now.

You can tell I'm drunk because I am swearing a lot more than usual. Going to general.

I really like what Que said: there are people who get famous being who they are, people who get famous because something happened to them, and people who become famous because of what they say. Dankula is the middle one.

He is pretty funny. Funnier than me anyway. I'm pretty jelly in a way. This got so many senpai's to notice him.

Yeah and in a few months I want to see how it goes for him, will he be able to entertain his audience, will he become a shill (like Candid) or will he fade into obscurity?

He should double down.

Train a bigger dog to do a worse thing.

Like growl when someone says "gypsy"

If I am actually racist again't anyone, it's them

They used to do "weddings" at the hotel I worked at

Where they used stolen credit cards, "married" 14 year olds, and we got cussed out by drunken seven year olds.

It's a destructive and toxic culture.

They also would try to steal anything that wasn't nailed down. That isn't an exaggeration. They tried to steal a matress once.

You are not following, what I am saying is that this is not a victory, this dumbass who likes to parrot socdem talking points, who decided to poorly frame his defense as "just a joke" and give the law legitimacy (by tacitly agreeing that since it is a joke, they just need to concentrate on the real Nazis), and on top of it all he is a fucking youtuber he will in a few months shilling for something.

You may be right, but as I said. I am drunk.

I will be ranting in general.

Well the man needed to cater his defense to the environment he was defending himself in. He can't just get rid of an established law in one court case. Especially not one that the establishment wants so badly.

It would be impossible for him to stand on the principle of freedom of speech because such a concept does not exist as a legal reality in Britain.

Also the "it was a joke" defense was an accurate one. He was making a joke. Would you rather him have come out as a devotee of Hitler in the courtroom? Oh yes, I'm sure that would have flown over very well.

You're disregarding the fact that if he won with the "joke" defense, he would have taken power away from that law. That comedians everywhere (in Britain, at least) would then be able to use that case as legal precedent.

If the man has any sense, he's going to appeal this case until he gets to a court with a damn jury in it.

Lol no the hate speech law was for real nazis, defending it as a joke that was stripped out of context was the best answer for him BC basically he didn't broke the law. And now all he has to do is pay a fine.

If anything my criticism is that this is a two step forward a step backwards victory

We haven't really achieved much

Yes, but now he'll have it on his record. I'd appeal it if I were him.

"The hate speech law was for real nazis" really swallowing the same old government PR hook line and sinker, aren't you? These laws NEVER stay within the bounds initially promised. How the hell do you think we came here in the first place?

How else would you have had Dank defend himself out of curiosity?

That's the whole thing he is not fighting the law or it's legitimacy, he is fighting so that him and other centrists won't be harmed.
And I want him to defend himself that this is a joke and that there is no hate speech.
But that is too much for this guy

He can't fight the law or its legitimacy because there is no guarantee of free speech in British law. The closest they have is something from the EU that makes provisions for anti hate speech law. You do realize that a lawyer has to work with the laws that a society has. Sure, Dank could have done what you said and absolutely guaranteed a guilty verdict and possibly be held in contempt of court as well.

https://twitter.com/CountDankulaTV/status/985996974007599104?s=20

To fight the law, he needs legal grounding. Especially against an activist judge like the one he got. The most he could do in this instance is fight it on the grounds that the law did not apply to his specific case.

He is a fag, who will never move the needle

To where you want to

You are now getting salty over bants. Go home.

I am at my house

Then take a break from the internet for a bit.

^

@Valet the Clown agreed Dankula is a fag

Look. Just because you don't like his politics doesn't mean you can just dismiss his struggle. Or try to cast aspersions on how he's handling this case (which he is appealing by the way).

I'm just calling him a fag

The tack he takes which is still weak is:
It's all about context. Since it was a joke, it was okay.

Packed in this is a corollary, which is the assumption that hate speech laws are a good thing, they are just catching the wrong targets. If someone is sincere in their speech they deserve jail, but these are obviously jokes with context stripped. I disagree
This is what I mean

He made a poor choice of framing as his clothes

Well he can't use any other tactics. Wether he likes it or not, his country recognizes hate speech as a punishable offense while not recognizing free speech as a universal. This is an argument for the legislature, not the courts

Yeah overall he is a trivial man

My problem is he doesn't go far enough to make a change and neither are his followers

The perfect is the enemy of the good in this case. He needs to focus on winning this court case before he or his supporters can move further.

I want to die

Calarts needs to be burned to the ground

So the good 2011 version was nothing then