ONLY CHOICES

WITH DIFFERENT RESULTS

SO WE MUST CHOOSE BY RESULTS

AND NOT BY PROXY

SUCH AS IDEOLOGY (SPIT)

Nihilism with current ethical standards and people's mental health and spiritual levels

Will lead only to excess

Excess in action will lead to excess in reaction

Ask Hitler

To me, if we take Nihilism as a vehicle, the only thing you can predict is nothing but a dark and foreboding storm, a sort of confusing and bizzare cataclysm of excess and insanity

From what I have read from Brett writings, Nihilism is a path that must followed by those who can understand (similar to 'spiritual enlightenment', or plato's cave), and must not be shaped as an ideology

By now I'm certain that guy that lives above me murders people

excess seems to be a "german" things (nazism, or extreme xenophilia in 2016)

If i believe, as i do, that my actions should be purposeful to those who will remain after me, and that they are nothing but a tiny fragment in the grand order of things, the grand scheme that transcends any individual or collective agency

then Nihilism, as an idea that we should engage without any idea of borders, set goals etc

Seems not to serve that belief

We should not resist our purpose because "nothing makes sense", from a viewpoint that is in itself nothing but an atomized viewpoint

Not to mention how much Nihilism, as an unrestrained perspective, consumes

And we are living in an age where conservation is one of the chief concerns

https://www.reddit.com/r/altright/comments/5n8urf/i_am_paul_kersey_of_sbpdl_ask_me_anything/?ref=share&ref_source=link

when i type paul kersey in yandex it gives me that actor of once upon a time in he west if im correct

ok i found him

Paul Kersey appears to be very prolific author

He should write on Jews, lulz

Nihilism does not deny purpose, it only states that there is no inherent truth, in this case "the great order of things" is simply reality, did you read this article http://www.amerika.org/politics/faith-through-nihilism/ ?

Brett seemsto have completely then redefined what Nihilism means

he reduced nihilism to its simplest definition: "Nihilism is the belief that all values are baseless and that nothing can be known or communicated. " and then expanded everything from it

Hmmmm, people's values are not heir foundation, instead, their life experiences are foundations to their values

They do not necessarilly communicate their system of values through language at all, but through common experience which shapes the heritage they pass to their offspring

Values that you and me, as fellow cavemen developed through our fight for survival in conditions that are typical of our living space

Were not concoted in our intellectual set

But were profoundly and directly experienced and communicated

Hence preservation of our "values" which essentially means *US* as a specie, relies on protection of our heritage

That is quite different from suggesting Nihilism as a default cognitive position, which again needs to be passed in an intellectual way, which every specie will then process according to it's own heritage, which essentially means, values

I don't see how to apply it to group setting (since we are species who no matter what live as a group) besides Mafia

But perhaps there are still some things to be clarified

I'm looking forward to your answers, will read them tomorrow because I'm off to sleep

From my experience communication can be difficult between individuals from the same heritage

Each individuals are differents in abilities

Each of them must have similars experiences to be able to 'communicate' these experiences, hence the creations of 'values'

values arise from experiences, and experiences arise from perceptions