Next you're gonna tell us how when Hillary Clinton got caught saying 'you need a public policy and a private policy' she was really talking about abe lincoln lol

Some ppl are like that ace but she wasnt

They're all for profit companies who Alex brings income to, they wouldn't throw away money if they weren't making some sort of agreement

Then under your logic, Candace Owens is an extreme anti-semite

She clearly was refering to white ppl as race

Candece is first and foremost dumb

Lel

I saw her fumbling on JR

With the climate change

That was realy sad

Candice was an SJW until Zoe Quinn decided to start a turf war with her.

Never forget social autopsy

Even though Quinn was right that social autopsy was a really bad idea that would lead to mass doxxing?

It was bad idea

Thats for sure

When's doxxing ever been a problem for SocJus? It was celebrated as a way to scare people into not going to stuff like Charlottesville.

You mean just like GamerGate and the Alt-right, Risotto? lel

<:GWfroggyPepoSmug:398570232647647242>

GamerGate are the harassers? Put down the kool aid

I wonder why didnt any of them get arrested

I can say the same for you good sir <:thunk:286263772132278284>

They must be real masters of harassment

Not really Zutt.

To avoid any consequences

Police at the time still considered online harrassment to be not a serious issue that's worth putting investigation. Doesn't really help that harrassers and doxxers are anonymous.

Hmm so they were anonymous

Yet you know it was the gg ppl

<:GWfroggyPepoSmug:398570232647647242>

Considering death threats are lobbed by both sides on basically all issues no matter how trivial i'd say the police really could care less or there would be consequences at some point

When have I said it was only GG pple? lol I only said that they were just as bad, if not worse at it then 'socjus'

The wolf is sending my flock death threats and this time I'm not making it up.

difference is that GG doesn't deny it has doxxers that flag on their side

Socjus poople claim they're innocent, yet have people doing it for them

https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2014/11/what-the-law-can-and-cant-do-about-online-harassment/382638/ I think this best describes the response of law officials, since this was written around the same time that the GG controversy happened.

I have seen a lot of GG deny that they have doxxers on their side.

but not all

I dont know if you can call them that tbh

socjus people just say "any harasser is GG"
GG says "We have them on both sides, not all are on our side"

Problem with any movement is that they are disorganized

So anyone can claim anything

Fact is the leading figures of gg didnt haras

criticism=harrassment according to all SJW