You'll basically just be cataloging their bona fides for the SJWs in control of ToS and platform moderation.

Or at least prevent them from finding wrongthink

Actually if you could just do the equivalent of a RICO investigation of ADL/SPLC/OSF that'd be great.

Beemann I think you misunderstand. Tim posted this page earlier <https://datasociety.net/people/directors-advisors/> and asked us to look into them.

A cursory look shows that they're 95% far left academics who have parasitically inserted themselves into silicon valley. There might be 5% of them that have actually written a line of code in their lives.

I'm saying instead of delving into the more far left people and their batshit politics we should instead look at the 5% who are actual developers and any of the academics who have written in support of moderate policies like free speech for all. and try to get their take on things.

Well, the graph can expand

The board of directors on that list are all true believers. Worthless to engage them.

I can't really give you guys the tools I normally use for this

but maybe I should spend the rest of the day building something similar

But some of the advisors might not have known what they were getting into with these people. They might have advised on things without knowing that the goal was deplatforming and censorship.

Well, I think some of the advisors are along for the ride

they obviously all just know eachother

I would say it's useless to engage them privately

But undermining them publicly has its perks

Not to mention, a study of a similar nature to the false one they published can be produced

and carry more weight, with a pile of well-sourced claims

Deirdre Mulligan for example is probably not someone who would support deplatforming.

The Mainstream Influence Network

Yeah, I think she's just there because of a connection with Danah Boyd

through the University of California at Berkeley, School of Information

Deirdre is ~~their lawyer~~ one of their lawyers, and Danah Boyd is a Ph Doctorate of theirs.

boyd is a true believer.

Probably, yes.

https://twitter.com/KeatonPatti/status/1043150115731644417?s=20

@wacka Megafake, but funny.

Spork/10

uhhh its get woke go broke andy .....

give the man a break, he's a ching-chong person after all 😛

they don't english well

Jesus fuck, where am I?

🇬 🇪 🇪 🇿

@LotheronPrime After the timestamp? I "skimmed" the video from there onward and didn't hear any specifics. Must've skipped over that part. The physical side of it I get. Was mainly wondering if the psychological aspect comes down to varying preferences.

xD

get go broke go

broke get get go woke

go woke go brokes

broke woke go get

Go broke
Got woke?

@possumsquat93 Nah he didn't go into specifics, but my guess is that men and women might behave differently, on average, during an incident