Message from @xorgy
Discord ID: 494352635403698196
it has a retroreflector
if that is the kind of proof you have, it shows your proof doesn't understand a thing about structure engineering
we put it there in the '60s
there are a LOT of anomalies about the moon in general actually
but you wouldn;t know about that i'm guessing
@xorgy clearly the government just had photoshop, and white lasers in the early 60's
yeah but there isn't a naturally occurring retroreflector on the moon, Joey
make fun of me all you want, i'm not stupid nor am i crazy
that's retarded.
what? i dont know what you are talking about
and somehow got russia, china, Australia, and japan to not call bs.
Clearly
Like seriously... you are willing to freaking belittle United State's accomplishments & tragedies to satisfy your conspiracy theory itch. You are willing to dishonor those who's lives were cut short during that fateful day and dishonor our American heroes made a dangerous trip to be the first men on the moon. You need to understand how insult that is for vast majority of United States citizens.
seriously, men put this shit on the moon so you could point lasers at it and know that it was there
you need a _big_ laser
but it can be reliably done
@Joey4Track (POLEMIC HEART) for the record, it would cost more to fake the moon landing at the time than to actually go to the moon.
yeah we may have been to the moon after but there is a good possibility the first one was faked
no it wouldn't lol
yes, a moon landing seems much cheaper
I mean, it's right there
you burn some shit
anyway, its hard to talk to normies about this kind of stuff and it usually doesn't get anywhere
just enough shit
and your little space-proof room will land on the moon
@Joey4Track (POLEMIC HEART) just remember that steel doesn't need to melt to fail. just take a paperclip and heat it up wit ha lighter if you want to get an idea
Not to mention... the equipment during that age couldn't replicate the moon landing video due to limitations of tech at the time.
dude dont talk to me about 9/11, its embarrassing
Steel's rigidity decreases precipitously at temperatures easily obtained in a flame from jet fuel
i pity anyone who can actually believe the official story
i got a notification on my phone of a new defranco vid, i am not subscribed to him i dont watch his outrage porn bullshit
well, what part of the official story do you disbelieve?
why the fuck i am getting notifications of stuff i dont watch
all of it
what official story
dude, dont take it from me, do your own research, 911 is an easy one
But there's pictures of footprints and moon rocks from the Apollo 11 mission