Message from @RyeNorth
Discord ID: 495106351723446273
If one of the women was a republican I might re evaluate.
The fact that they are all activists for the left prior make me more skeptical
But with some of the accusations...
some women admit they only believe her because someting happened to them
I think it's funny that the accusations about Pedesta had more credibility...
A women on npr backed out of her comment saying she could collaborate Ford statement when she could not actually provide any evidence. She said she only made the statment because it made her feel empowered
Ellison accuser also has more evidence than all of kavanagh accusers combined
If the left wants to buy Kavanaugh, can we agree that pizza gate wasn't so crazy?
Media is the left, so no.
Anyway, introduce me to Roe v. Wade it seems to be thrown around a bit. I checked wiki and it seemed to go into whether late term abortions could be considered constitutionally legal.
But I’m missing something I bet
I think it's less about abortions and more a court precedent against states rights
That's why it's considered such a pillar
i don't think roe v wade will get overturnedeven if kavanaugh is sworn in. Robert's strike me as a don't wanna rock the boat type even if he is Conservative
So whether the main body can deny a state to make those terms?
I think its wackier than that. Isn't it like because right to privacy for medical records women can get abortions.
If roe v wade weren't there, states would make abortion law
Oh okay so
I would rather that.
Roe v. Wade allowed the federal gov to say every state should feel the same way about x because they said so?
Yes
Okay, that helps
That's my take anyway
And abortion was just a bi-product of it
If I thought strongly 1 way or another that a. abortion was murder or b.abortion wasn't murder I wouldn't want its legality decided by arbitrary state law
I'm a centrist reformist though
Death penalty is state by state
Mileage may vary
So I think maybe abortion should be controlled a bit more with federal guidelines and states hold up a bit. But it now seems clearer roe v wade was a states rights issue in the end
Roe vs Wade is entirely predicated on privacy
The Court ruled 7–2 that a right to privacy under the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment extended to a woman's decision to have an abortion
from wikipedia
Okay so I think I remember within their home they talked about abortions with women?
basically yeah, and the third trimester thing is because that is when a woman starts to "show" and it becomes public.
I can see why evangelicals on one side hold their stance on that issue and why many feminists hold their opposite stance. It's 1 of the few issues i can see why both sides wouldn't want to comprimise an inch
well Abortion is a state's issue.
I'm opposed to abortion because I see the need for it as a symptom of hedonism.
And I dislike hedonism.
I am opposed to it personally, but 10th amendment is the 10th amendment and if a state votes to legalize it