Message from @Beef Taquitos

Discord ID: 496443779046178827


2018-10-01 22:06:48 UTC  

dayum democrats... "In 1864, an amendment abolishing slavery passed the U.S. Senate but died in the House as Democrats rallied in the name of states’ rights. The election of 1864 brought Lincoln back to the White Housealong withsignificant Republican majorities in both houses, so it appeared the amendment was headed for passage when the new Congress convened in March 1865. Lincoln preferred that the amendment receive bipartisan support–some Democrats indicated support for the measure, but many still resisted. The amendment passed 119 to 56, seven votes above the necessary two-thirds majority."

2018-10-01 22:06:50 UTC  

Just like how I don't call myself a feminist anymore

2018-10-01 22:07:04 UTC  

Which ***is why i said i believe he has an incorrect defintion of social justice and requested disprovement***

2018-10-01 22:07:18 UTC  

disprovement?

2018-10-01 22:07:24 UTC  

is that a word?

2018-10-01 22:07:30 UTC  

hm...

2018-10-01 22:07:30 UTC  

Social equity. He's not wrong here

2018-10-01 22:07:52 UTC  

You are conflating the tactics of radicals with the entire concept of social justice

2018-10-01 22:08:02 UTC  

That is merely dishonest

2018-10-01 22:08:09 UTC  

No I'm conflating radicals with the most pure enactment of social justice.

2018-10-01 22:08:24 UTC  

forcing equality of outcome because that's "fair"

2018-10-01 22:08:28 UTC  

You'd still be wrong

2018-10-01 22:08:40 UTC  

"You can't be racist against whites" was the last drop

2018-10-01 22:08:43 UTC  

The radicals here, have a fucked up world view in the first place

2018-10-01 22:08:56 UTC  

that's equity, because you can say "it's about equity" and they can say "it's about equity" and you're both being honest

2018-10-01 22:09:02 UTC  

Based on derrada and foucalt

2018-10-01 22:09:19 UTC  

Where the world is based on systems of power

2018-10-01 22:09:19 UTC  

because nebulous bullshit can be used for good and bad, again like the religion comparison

2018-10-01 22:09:50 UTC  

but the nebulous bullshit boils down to "acquiring justice for people through means other than the actual justice system"

2018-10-01 22:10:08 UTC  

See, I'd describe a good social justice advocate as people like Stephen fry, or MLK

2018-10-01 22:10:20 UTC  

stephen fry is not a fucking social justice advocate

2018-10-01 22:10:24 UTC  

The bad ones, someone like PZ Myers

2018-10-01 22:10:31 UTC  

PZ myers is

2018-10-01 22:10:38 UTC  

@Beef Taquitos He classifies himself as such

2018-10-01 22:10:48 UTC  

He said good social justice, you dink.

2018-10-01 22:10:56 UTC  

His openning statement on the munk debate

2018-10-01 22:11:00 UTC  

there is no such thing as good social justice

2018-10-01 22:11:06 UTC  

that's like dry water or cold fire

2018-10-01 22:11:07 UTC  

😐

2018-10-01 22:11:08 UTC  

Then you are dishonest.

2018-10-01 22:11:10 UTC  

Don't be obtuse.

2018-10-01 22:11:31 UTC  

it's like *ethical child porn*(you guys might not get the Destiny reference there)

2018-10-01 22:11:41 UTC  

Don't be obtuse.

2018-10-01 22:11:49 UTC  

says the person repeating themselves.

2018-10-01 22:12:01 UTC  

I wouldn't have to.

2018-10-01 22:12:05 UTC  

But you continued.

2018-10-01 22:12:15 UTC  

Social justice is a cancer. The only good social justice is no social justice.

2018-10-01 22:12:32 UTC  

Anything that purports to be "justice" besides actual justice is garbage

2018-10-01 22:12:45 UTC  

Yo folks if Social Justice is a religion then Tim is agnostic? <:TimThink:482277772497125378>

2018-10-01 22:12:47 UTC  

~~: Prove me wrong.~~

2018-10-01 22:13:22 UTC  

sorry, that's not the meme