Message from @Beef Taquitos
Discord ID: 496444262100238346
Where the world is based on systems of power
because nebulous bullshit can be used for good and bad, again like the religion comparison
but the nebulous bullshit boils down to "acquiring justice for people through means other than the actual justice system"
See, I'd describe a good social justice advocate as people like Stephen fry, or MLK
stephen fry is not a fucking social justice advocate
The bad ones, someone like PZ Myers
PZ myers is
@Beef Taquitos He classifies himself as such
He said good social justice, you dink.
His openning statement on the munk debate
there is no such thing as good social justice
that's like dry water or cold fire
😐
Then you are dishonest.
Don't be obtuse.
it's like *ethical child porn*(you guys might not get the Destiny reference there)
Don't be obtuse.
says the person repeating themselves.
I wouldn't have to.
But you continued.
Anything that purports to be "justice" besides actual justice is garbage
Yo folks if Social Justice is a religion then Tim is agnostic? <:TimThink:482277772497125378>
~~: Prove me wrong.~~
sorry, that's not the meme
: Change my mind.
Equality of opportunity existed before "social justice". Equality of outcome is what social justice was created for.
No that's communism
He and you are wrong if you think it's about equality of opportunity.
Vague definitions is a problem. I've noticed that SJW people don't think equality of opportunity and outcome are different. If I remember correctly Thomas Smith said he was for equality of opportunity, but when pressed on it he said we measure equality of opportunity by the outcomes. Sorry, I might be side tracking the discussion you guys were having.
Same thing.
Well people having terrible understanding of *language and therefore terrible conclusions is pretty typical, which again is why I think he's arrived at a bad definition of social justice.
He's pretty reasonable so I don't think he's got bad logical processes
I compare it to feminism here because every time you try to nail down feminism it boils down to "equality" which is a wholly inappropriate definition both for the concept and how they implement it. Same with the way social justice is being defined here and how he seems to deal with it.
Does Tim clarify what Kanye meant about the 13th amendment thing?
I don't remember him mentioning that
just remember him agreeing with him about a lot and not knowing wtf he was saying a lot, which tends to be how kanye works
I haven't watched the latest video yet, so I can't comment on it yet. It would not surprise me though if Tim is still trying to hold on to a word the SJWs are corrupting.
I didn't watch the clip and I didn't know he mentioned that when he was speaking so I'd say unless I was heavily distracted, no tim didn't mention it
The SJWs are literally the zealots of the concept, they're not corrupting it, they're the inevitable outcome of it