Message from @Beef Taquitos
Discord ID: 496443016412790795
He's probably grooming her. GOTEM
Good, Social Justice
Bad social justice is where you compel people to consider everyone equal
Legally, or by mob justice
hmm the 13th amendment failed the first time it was brought to the house because the democrats voted it out
a year later the republicans had a majority in both houses and managed to get it through
```eq·ui·ty
noun
noun: equity
1.
the quality of being fair and impartial.```
This is literally the opposite of everything social justice advocates for
on a second vote
they advocate for discrimination in favor of certain groups
and LITERAL SEGREGATION in some cases
Yep
Bad Social justice
Where it doesn't lead to equality, it simply leads to more division
A particularly good example is the Evergreen Fiasco
you guffaw'd my christianity argument, but the crusades were still done by christians, the bad social justice is still social justice and it's still the dominant form of social justice
it's still the one that went to the UN to argue that video games are horrible and sexist and need to be changed to include more non-gamers
Probably. which is why I don't call myself a social justice advocate anymore
dayum democrats... "In 1864, an amendment abolishing slavery passed the U.S. Senate but died in the House as Democrats rallied in the name of states’ rights. The election of 1864 brought Lincoln back to the White Housealong withsignificant Republican majorities in both houses, so it appeared the amendment was headed for passage when the new Congress convened in March 1865. Lincoln preferred that the amendment receive bipartisan support–some Democrats indicated support for the measure, but many still resisted. The amendment passed 119 to 56, seven votes above the necessary two-thirds majority."
Just like how I don't call myself a feminist anymore
Which ***is why i said i believe he has an incorrect defintion of social justice and requested disprovement***
is that a word?
hm...
Social equity. He's not wrong here
You are conflating the tactics of radicals with the entire concept of social justice
That is merely dishonest
No I'm conflating radicals with the most pure enactment of social justice.
forcing equality of outcome because that's "fair"
You'd still be wrong
"You can't be racist against whites" was the last drop
The radicals here, have a fucked up world view in the first place
that's equity, because you can say "it's about equity" and they can say "it's about equity" and you're both being honest
Based on derrada and foucalt
Where the world is based on systems of power
because nebulous bullshit can be used for good and bad, again like the religion comparison
but the nebulous bullshit boils down to "acquiring justice for people through means other than the actual justice system"
See, I'd describe a good social justice advocate as people like Stephen fry, or MLK
stephen fry is not a fucking social justice advocate
The bad ones, someone like PZ Myers
PZ myers is
@Beef Taquitos He classifies himself as such