```eq·ui·ty
noun
noun: equity

1.
the quality of being fair and impartial.```
This is literally the opposite of everything social justice advocates for

on a second vote

they advocate for discrimination in favor of certain groups

and LITERAL SEGREGATION in some cases

Yep

Bad Social justice

Where it doesn't lead to equality, it simply leads to more division

A particularly good example is the Evergreen Fiasco

you guffaw'd my christianity argument, but the crusades were still done by christians, the bad social justice is still social justice and it's still the dominant form of social justice

it's still the one that went to the UN to argue that video games are horrible and sexist and need to be changed to include more non-gamers

Probably. which is why I don't call myself a social justice advocate anymore

dayum democrats... "In 1864, an amendment abolishing slavery passed the U.S. Senate but died in the House as Democrats rallied in the name of states’ rights. The election of 1864 brought Lincoln back to the White Housealong withsignificant Republican majorities in both houses, so it appeared the amendment was headed for passage when the new Congress convened in March 1865. Lincoln preferred that the amendment receive bipartisan support–some Democrats indicated support for the measure, but many still resisted. The amendment passed 119 to 56, seven votes above the necessary two-thirds majority."

Just like how I don't call myself a feminist anymore

Which ***is why i said i believe he has an incorrect defintion of social justice and requested disprovement***

disprovement?

is that a word?

hm...

Social equity. He's not wrong here

You are conflating the tactics of radicals with the entire concept of social justice

That is merely dishonest

No I'm conflating radicals with the most pure enactment of social justice.

forcing equality of outcome because that's "fair"

You'd still be wrong

"You can't be racist against whites" was the last drop

The radicals here, have a fucked up world view in the first place

that's equity, because you can say "it's about equity" and they can say "it's about equity" and you're both being honest

Based on derrada and foucalt

Where the world is based on systems of power

because nebulous bullshit can be used for good and bad, again like the religion comparison

but the nebulous bullshit boils down to "acquiring justice for people through means other than the actual justice system"

See, I'd describe a good social justice advocate as people like Stephen fry, or MLK

stephen fry is not a fucking social justice advocate

The bad ones, someone like PZ Myers

PZ myers is

@Beef Taquitos He classifies himself as such

He said good social justice, you dink.

His openning statement on the munk debate

there is no such thing as good social justice

that's like dry water or cold fire

😐

Then you are dishonest.