Message from @♓♏♋
Discord ID: 497134673365958666
Virtually all psychological research that has not been buried by feminists indicates that women are more akin to adult children.
Sharia is a good example of something that is entirely based on the wants and needs of women. Women are only interested in the very best of men? Cool, we make it so that all of you can flock to the top 25% of men. You dont like when men such as gays dont dedicate themselves to pleasing and serving you? Cool, we will execute them. You dont like that more attractive women take attention away from you?Cool, we make it so they have to hide themselves.
Read from Lawrence Kohlberg and go through citations.
I keep hearing this argument more and more.
Because we unbury more and more of it. That was accepted before the 70s pretty much. Even the New York Times wrote about it.
Well done
Gonna paste this elsewhere
During the 70s, feminists started entering the academia and buried most of it.
That is also why we now have such astronomically ridiculous numbers on the prevalence of rape.
Or, take studies such as those of Koss, 1994.
Feminists simply buried what we started to find out about women's moral and psychological development during the 20th century.
as a matter of fact, you can logically see that children more then adults will "suffer" more under the conditions of the nature they are born in (male/female) then adults, as they have not yet been socialised fully by repeat exposiure
Yes, as sad as it is Punks4Trump actually makes a good argument, even if it's kind of tongue in cheek, a little.
A lot of Sharia is actually enforced by women.
Enforcement of moral cultural values for women has always primarily been done by other women.
a male child over time will behave less naturally on average, unless tought to be natural
and vice versa
Yeah
A lot of enforcement of Sharia, in the home in particular, is done by other women.
which is not good or bad btw
RIP my purity
But fake it till you make it is a thing
So
Unnatural stuff becomes natural
No, it's not really that unnatural.
Under Sharia, men are forced to take care of women, and women are forced into the role of the protected.
But still different from instinctual
there is nothing in our nature that suggests women cant to traditionally male work, and vice versa
The amount of authoritarianism involved is higher, but the roles are consistent with evolutionary biology.
the issue is that they need to be exceptional at male work in order for them to be worth giving up their caretaker biology
cant nurse a baby while hunting
Men are not completely free under Sharia. For example, if a woman wishes to move out, the man has to provide her with a place to live and servants, if she was accustomed to them.
Woman are also entitled to all of her earnings, while a man under Sharia has to provide for his woman.
Sharia is a bit like feminism in that men nowadays are forced by the state to subsidize women, while women abnegate many of the responsibilities that fall on men.
was Sharia woke from the start?! <:TimThink:482277772497125378>
yes and no
for one, if it was woke enough it would have gone broke by now
For example, despite all the clamoring for equality, to this day Selective Service registration is for men only. This was upheld by the Senate as recently as 2016.