Wait

Everyone will pay into Welfare State all the same so.. yay

let me reparse that ...

Hoppe is interesting: anarchy > monarchy > democracy

There is a line from the top left of the political compass down to the bottom right, and anyone below it is invalid.

Arguing about the size of the market is a little strange.

I had a whole list of studies that showed that population growth is not really linked with GDP per capita.

If you have a small country, you can still have a very healthy economy.

A country of 85 million like Germany is not going to have the same GDP as a country twice that size with the same GDP per capita. That is basic arithmetic.

at the end one give money the value one wants

by one i mean WE

```"We must promote the idea of secession. Or more specifically, we must promote the idea of a world composed of tens of thousands of distinct districts, regions, and cantons, and hundred of thousands of independent free cities such as the present day oddities of Monaco, Andorra, San Marino, Liechtenstein, Hong Kong, and Singapore. Greatly increased opportunities for economically motivated migration would thus result, and the world would be one of small [classically] liberal governments economically integrated through free trade and an international commodity money such as gold."
-Hoppe```

Bigger Market means more money at the top and less at the bottom so per capita remains same

Furry holocaust when?

Fur is murder.

I'm very confused by that definition.

utopic concepts

are invalid

A bigger market means more money at the top?

Why?

Total income and income distribution are logically distinct.

the gap betwen the rich and the poor increased due to globalism

Polyarcho-capitalism is best ism.

Nothing scales perfectly, but to assume that you cannot scale an economy and retain similar distribution, in the same system, is not obvious to me.

Cost Savings of Labor? Lower Wages?

In fact, the wealth distribution in similarly organized economic systems of different size is very similar.

More Jobs and Less Labour = High Wages, Vice Versa

Square root of population produces 50% of output. That doesn't scale linearly.

polyarcho??

Are you talking about absolute numbers or distribution?

Sure, the absolute numbers change if you have a country twice the size with the same GDP per capita.

for globalism to work as it is right now, you need poor and uneducated people to gain labor from ( like slave labor) and richer people to sell those products the slaves make at 5 to 20 times cheaper the price than it would cost to make them in the country where they are being sold.

I'm not sure what to make of that insight, though.

Globalism increases inequality within rich countries by playing on the inequality between rich and poor countries. It runs the race to the bottom.

by doing that the industries that used to make those products die

and globalists gain more market share

plus some regulations to make it really hard for anyone to make it like ''global warming'' regulations

The bigger the population, the bigger the inequality.

no

Yes

?