```"We must promote the idea of secession. Or more specifically, we must promote the idea of a world composed of tens of thousands of distinct districts, regions, and cantons, and hundred of thousands of independent free cities such as the present day oddities of Monaco, Andorra, San Marino, Liechtenstein, Hong Kong, and Singapore. Greatly increased opportunities for economically motivated migration would thus result, and the world would be one of small [classically] liberal governments economically integrated through free trade and an international commodity money such as gold."
-Hoppe```

Bigger Market means more money at the top and less at the bottom so per capita remains same

Furry holocaust when?

Fur is murder.

I'm very confused by that definition.

utopic concepts

are invalid

A bigger market means more money at the top?

Why?

Total income and income distribution are logically distinct.

the gap betwen the rich and the poor increased due to globalism

Polyarcho-capitalism is best ism.

Nothing scales perfectly, but to assume that you cannot scale an economy and retain similar distribution, in the same system, is not obvious to me.

Cost Savings of Labor? Lower Wages?

In fact, the wealth distribution in similarly organized economic systems of different size is very similar.

More Jobs and Less Labour = High Wages, Vice Versa

Square root of population produces 50% of output. That doesn't scale linearly.

polyarcho??

Are you talking about absolute numbers or distribution?

Sure, the absolute numbers change if you have a country twice the size with the same GDP per capita.

for globalism to work as it is right now, you need poor and uneducated people to gain labor from ( like slave labor) and richer people to sell those products the slaves make at 5 to 20 times cheaper the price than it would cost to make them in the country where they are being sold.

I'm not sure what to make of that insight, though.

Globalism increases inequality within rich countries by playing on the inequality between rich and poor countries. It runs the race to the bottom.

by doing that the industries that used to make those products die

and globalists gain more market share

plus some regulations to make it really hard for anyone to make it like ''global warming'' regulations

The bigger the population, the bigger the inequality.

no

Yes

?

thats a oversimplified statement

depends on population type

The bigger the population the bigger the inequality?

I'm not sure that's obvious.

Square root of population produces 50% of output = The bigger the population, the bigger the inequality.

Various countries in Europe have vastly different size and very similar rates of poverty.

are we at 8 billion ?

or still at 7

Sweden has 10 million people, Germany 85.

Where do you see the starkest contrast?

wouldn't flooding the Swedish Job Market with Millions of Germany's Skilled Techies result in Low Salaries?