Message from @Undead Mockingbird
Discord ID: 498869217366376461
Bigger Market means more money at the top and less at the bottom so per capita remains same
Furry holocaust when?
Fur is murder.
I'm very confused by that definition.
utopic concepts
are invalid
A bigger market means more money at the top?
Why?
Total income and income distribution are logically distinct.
the gap betwen the rich and the poor increased due to globalism
Polyarcho-capitalism is best ism.
Nothing scales perfectly, but to assume that you cannot scale an economy and retain similar distribution, in the same system, is not obvious to me.
Cost Savings of Labor? Lower Wages?
In fact, the wealth distribution in similarly organized economic systems of different size is very similar.
More Jobs and Less Labour = High Wages, Vice Versa
Square root of population produces 50% of output. That doesn't scale linearly.
polyarcho??
Are you talking about absolute numbers or distribution?
Sure, the absolute numbers change if you have a country twice the size with the same GDP per capita.
for globalism to work as it is right now, you need poor and uneducated people to gain labor from ( like slave labor) and richer people to sell those products the slaves make at 5 to 20 times cheaper the price than it would cost to make them in the country where they are being sold.
Globalism increases inequality within rich countries by playing on the inequality between rich and poor countries. It runs the race to the bottom.
by doing that the industries that used to make those products die
and globalists gain more market share
plus some regulations to make it really hard for anyone to make it like ''global warming'' regulations
The bigger the population, the bigger the inequality.
no
Yes
?
thats a oversimplified statement
depends on population type
The bigger the population the bigger the inequality?
I'm not sure that's obvious.
Square root of population produces 50% of output = The bigger the population, the bigger the inequality.
Various countries in Europe have vastly different size and very similar rates of poverty.
are we at 8 billion ?
or still at 7
Sweden has 10 million people, Germany 85.
Where do you see the starkest contrast?
wouldn't flooding the Swedish Job Market with Millions of Germany's Skilled Techies result in Low Salaries?
I am confused why you assume that two countries of different size cannot have the same wealth distribution.