Message from @Timcast

Discord ID: 499681453228163073


2018-10-10 20:33:38 UTC  

blind systems will favor power

2018-10-10 20:33:42 UTC  

it shouldn't **reject** resumes for being from women, but it's definitely a factor that needs to be considered.

2018-10-10 20:33:43 UTC  

aside from a larger sample

2018-10-10 20:33:52 UTC  

we need regulation to prevent collapse

2018-10-10 20:34:00 UTC  

women need to be able to support themselves

2018-10-10 20:34:23 UTC  

dude women aren't in jeopardy here

2018-10-10 20:34:23 UTC  

One of the late night comedians did a blind hire thin

2018-10-10 20:34:23 UTC  

maybe we are in the good place

2018-10-10 20:34:25 UTC  

or perhaps we could just not have ai handle hiring people?

2018-10-10 20:34:31 UTC  

where people can decide to favor women a little bit

2018-10-10 20:34:36 UTC  

If its a learning AI then inevitably you gonna end up with exactly the same thing, men ending up being favored at the upper levels.
We already know why this is because biology

2018-10-10 20:34:47 UTC  

The issue is, if we push so hard to favor a gender, is that not just discrimination by another name?

2018-10-10 20:34:52 UTC  

do i have to post the chart again?

2018-10-10 20:34:53 UTC  

it is

2018-10-10 20:35:05 UTC  

but we cant allow algorithms to say women is a bad trait

2018-10-10 20:35:14 UTC  

we want to maximize efficiency

2018-10-10 20:35:22 UTC  

that means there are women who deserve to be in positions of power

2018-10-10 20:35:30 UTC  

Or maybe we can just you know ...HIRE THE BEST PERSON FOR THE JOB

2018-10-10 20:35:30 UTC  

and arbitrarily restricting them is inefficient

2018-10-10 20:35:32 UTC  

I don't disagree; gender should be irrelevant to selection process, whenever possible.

2018-10-10 20:35:42 UTC  

thats what im saying, the algorithm was bad

2018-10-10 20:35:44 UTC  

Ye

2018-10-10 20:35:47 UTC  

I would argue that for some jobs restricting women is efficient.

2018-10-10 20:35:56 UTC  

You mentioned 'fireman' in your video.

2018-10-10 20:35:58 UTC  

like firefighter

2018-10-10 20:36:01 UTC  

contro get out of here with that stuff

2018-10-10 20:36:13 UTC  

this isnt the 1990s, this is the enlightented times of the 21st century

2018-10-10 20:36:15 UTC  

There are some jobs where gender can have an effect, but if you measure the benchmarks it will automatically select for gender anyway.

2018-10-10 20:36:16 UTC  

but there are jobs that women can do in the department

2018-10-10 20:36:17 UTC  

i dont really care if my boss is a man or a women or whatever.
But i do have a problem with my government telling us that by the year 2020 we want to have 40% of government being women.

2018-10-10 20:36:20 UTC  

We need to hire more female garbage women

2018-10-10 20:36:22 UTC  

and

2018-10-10 20:36:27 UTC  

we shouldnt restrict women period

2018-10-10 20:36:31 UTC  

More male nurses

2018-10-10 20:36:35 UTC  

lot of blasphemy going on here right now

2018-10-10 20:36:39 UTC  

if a 250 pounds ripped woman wants to be a firefighter

2018-10-10 20:36:39 UTC  

Spending time and resources training female firefighters which are not going to perform as well as male firefighters is inefficient.

2018-10-10 20:36:40 UTC  

good

2018-10-10 20:36:41 UTC  

for example, if there is a baseline fitness requirement, it will weed out a lot of women, because of hormones and muscle mass and the like.

2018-10-10 20:36:45 UTC  

If they can do the job then im pretty sure no one in here is against hiring them for it

2018-10-10 20:36:47 UTC  

restricting women period would be bad :c