Message from @Kyle Judkins
Discord ID: 502800994573352963
i dont mind africa
i mind islam
Kyle
i mind both, they're a threat to my money and livelyhood
this is what my sister is saying
send them back to middle east.
she saying she wants my D?
;D
nah
rip
she thicc tho?
she's my sister the fuck i know
my GF has a 2:! ass to waist ratio
can she beat that?
**2:1
2 to exclamation mark? wooaah thats rad
no idea
yeah
measure her ass cheek width
Why would you care about ratio, she's belgian, so prolly a ginger
i make exceptions
@Kyle Judkins I've read atleast 3 people respond to you on the point you're using this study to make..
http://scienceblogs.com/cortex/2006/07/26/adoption-and-iq/
You can have Children and Adults who have an IQ below their natural capability. For example malnutrition can have an affect on IQ. You can have an Einstein and hit him on the head with a Steel Bat, IQ will go down.
You can decrease the IQ, But you cannot increase the IQ beyond the biological capability of a person. If you can find a way you'll win the Nobel Prize.
she can take my saxon genes
yeah i was putting it out there
"Consistent with the proposition that intelligence is mainly inherited, these studies have almost always found that adopted youngsters more closely resemble their biological than their adoptive parents. Such findings have supported the assumption that changing a child’s life circumstances won’t alter the hard facts of nature."
same study kyle
yeah
Time to insert wypipo brains into black bodies, and win that sweet Nobel Prize
which is my argument
but it shows that nurture is a big component regardless
too much weight on nurture
it does have an influence
which is pretty obvious
if it's 13 fucking IQ points
ill take it
thats the difference between 100 and 113
lol
but its not blank slate nonsense that the social sciences are pushing out on a daily basis these days
and 113 isnt embarassing
Nurture helps prevent dropping in IQ from malnutrition
Knowledge helps maximise the potential
Genetics creates a biological limit