Message from @ᚠᚢᛖᛚᛖᛞᛒᚣᚳᚨᚿᚳᛖᚱ

Discord ID: 688102462116200538


2020-03-13 18:49:57 UTC  

what's the napkin-version of that PDF?

2020-03-13 18:52:14 UTC  

if I understood it, looks like there might be some meds soon to test on live subjects

2020-03-13 18:54:35 UTC  

First one is a paper on using Deep Learning to screen lots of compounds to come up with a few thousand that should probably be tested.

2020-03-13 18:55:58 UTC  

Second is since you can get both a positive screening for normal flu does not mean you don't have the WuFlu as well.

2020-03-13 18:59:27 UTC  

I'm actually not sure what is special about the third, that seems to be a description of how most of the current kits work:
> This protocol shows an accuracy and sensitivity limit of 1-10 virus particles as we tested with a known lentivirus. The cost for each sample is estimated to be less than 15 US dollars. Overall time it takes for an entire protocol is estimated to be less than 4 hours. We propose a cost-effective, quick-and-easy method for early detection of SARS-CoV-2 at any conventional Biosafety Level II laboratories that are equipped with a rtPCR machine. Our newly developed protocol should be helpful for a first-hand screening of the asymptomatic virus-carriers for further prevention of transmission and early intervention and treatment for the rapidly propagating virus.

2020-03-13 19:05:12 UTC  

well .. about that second, I know some doctors here, who have been playing around with concept of:

> The flu test are fast and trustworthy. Sooooo ... if a coofer that looks like flu comes in, we do quick Flu A and Flu B tests, and if those both fail, we can send it to do that long-ass Wuflu test

2020-03-13 19:05:59 UTC  

It works, it's just not a foolproof way of finding out if they have WuFlu.

2020-03-13 19:06:23 UTC  

I really get annoyed by people, who complain that "there is not enough testing", because they think that doing an antigen kit is as fast as taking a pregnency test

2020-03-13 19:06:37 UTC  

That third one is actually about coming up with possible self administered kits and wide distribution of them as I read it over further.

read the full article first maybe <:smugon:512048583806025739>

2020-03-13 19:07:58 UTC  

@ᚠᚢᛖᛚᛖᛞᛒᚣᚳᚨᚿᚳᛖᚱ lemme guess - the tests still will take long-ass time and a lot of manpower

2020-03-13 19:09:13 UTC  

(I really don't want to read scientific papers, since I am currently learning about PostgreSQL, that I will need for my next job)

2020-03-13 19:09:48 UTC  

Running late but should start soon.

2020-03-13 19:10:15 UTC  

heh, White House has an official youtube channel 😄

2020-03-13 19:11:52 UTC  

if the country goes in full lockdown, I suspect that Trump might start doing livestreams and taking questions as superchats

2020-03-13 19:12:12 UTC  

... hell, Bernie was doing something like that on Twitch

2020-03-13 19:13:22 UTC  

to be fair if you were in the Bernie Twitch chat you'd see it was mostly people mocking socialism and Bernie 😛 it was a good readin

@tereško ``` An important key step in this study was to identify the unique primer target sequences that can distinguish the SARS-CoV-2 over other common RNAs from human tissue. We utilized the recently reported full sequence of the genomic RNA for SARS-CoV-2 from the first patient in Republic of Korea (Fig. 5; [12]) to search for the unique sequences to specifically target SARS-CoV-2. We initially found 3 primer sets available from CDC targeting N, nucleocapsid protein gene [11]: CDC_N1, CDC_N2, and CDC_N3 (Fig. 5; Table 1). Unexpectedly, two of these three primer sets, CDC_N2 and CDC_N3, gave false positive signals with significant Ct values of 20. 266 and 21.129 (Ct < 37) during SYBR Green-based rtPCR even in the absence of cDNA (no template control condition) (Fig. 6A; Table 2). More surprisingly, we found a clear PCR product band size of less than 100 base pair when we performed electrophoresis with the reaction product after the rtPCR (Fig. 6B). These results were difficult to understand considering the fact that there was no cDNA template to amplify. From these primer validation tests, we decided not to pursuit the primer sets originated from CDC. ``` TL;DR CDC LMAO

2020-03-13 19:23:56 UTC  

wait ... so in the early samples there a large RNA fragments that do nothing?

2020-03-13 19:25:18 UTC  

I really want to know, that is the CCP "official explanation" for why they are not providing samples to other countries from first know nCoW cases ....

@tereško no cow <:smugay:593502151758708776>

2020-03-13 19:43:26 UTC  

Trump isn't even giving the conference because he's infected

Trump is Eugene 2.0 "It's just the flu bro!"

2020-03-13 19:46:36 UTC  

Nah, Trump seems to be over is "just a flu bro" phase.

Never forgetti <:smugon:512048583806025739> they are both retards by saying that.

2020-03-13 19:47:46 UTC  

Holy cow italy

inferior italian genes <:smugon:512048583806025739> <:BIGBRAIN:501101491428392991>

2020-03-13 19:48:36 UTC  

Italy's medical system has collapsed at this point

2020-03-13 19:52:25 UTC  

They're chads

2020-03-13 19:52:38 UTC  

Pastaguinis getting mopped

can you niggas stop posting the same article 10000 times?

2020-03-13 20:00:25 UTC  

Especially while the press conference is still happening so the articles don't have all the info.

2020-03-13 20:01:26 UTC  

How about some news from the only website that matters <:BIGBRAIN:501101491428392991>

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/678532257924907018/688114514495012864/unknown.png

2020-03-13 20:01:52 UTC  

Of course now that he's got a new conference, this is slightly passé