Message from @A Haunted Army
Discord ID: 506782393420611595
from teh start
And 3rd it will have massive repercussions farther down the line
its more i'm pretty numb to everything
Then you are a cold bastard.
>.>
so i nearly felt something is really good
i'll agree with you on the first two
Dude lost everything, spent days trying to survive. They found him on the day he was ready to kill himself.
Reason he was trying to chase them off in the first place.
what negatice repercussions is there for stopping birth tourism?
so the 13th AND 14th, both were written and pushed through by republicans against the veto attempts of the democrats
Then... he gave them a chance and he is glad for it. He goes out with a smile on his face, being thankful to know them.
but to say it will have massive repercussions is subjective
You can say his choice not to hardball it will have massive repercussions too
do you want russia shipping over pregnant women to get anchor babies then in 18yrs have them vote specific ways?
but i agree, throwing an executive order for this is wrong, and it most likely violates the 14th amendment to the US constitution
No, but this wont prevent it
Just delay it
And delaying a solution does not solve it
how would it delay it?
And by massive repercussions I mean that the order could get sued and then reach the supreme court and have judicial precedent against it
Meaning that it will be legal to have Russian anchor babies
but i don't see how making it so none-citzens babies don't get citzenship only delays the babies from getting citizenship
And it cant be curbed
"Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."
It only mentiones no-state though, Federal is not written in 🤔
one could interprate that as not violating the constitution anymore
mind you i'm not a legal expert
i would argue babies born from birth tourism aren't subject to the jurisdiction of the united states so don't get citizenship
Except if that were true then the feds could impugn our own lives as citizens
its a bit more confusing with ilegal migrants though
since they stay around and i guess are subject to it.
what makes you think they aren't already?
Also state just represents entity
could be, i dunno
i'm not an expert on the US constitution and laws
regardless he still shouldn't use executive power like that
I am no expert either but I had made that my lifes work so I work from with the concepts of the constitution and law written and handed to the executive branch
I keep reading your name like Chode 😂 @Cody
You forgot the 's'😂
Lol