We let welfare recipients vote

why not women

where its all about the pandering and nothing about the responsabilities

hmm

when things go wrong just blame men -feminsits 2018

equal rights are equal regardless of responsibility.

That is also why I absolutely loathe the usage of "equality" when describing communism:

If you give people who are not equal the same rewards, you are rewarding the one who worked least most.

That is not equality and it is not fairness.

Do rich people get more rights because they adopt more responsibility? No.

but it is in outcome

As ex-military, I served on the front line with good women who could put as much in as the guys, in fact more in some cases

Do poor people get less rights because they can't even be responsible for themselves? No.

No

Yes. Pay all your employees $20/h regardless of how much they work, and see how well morality will fare.

Equal rights are ***equal*** regardless of individual competence or responsibility.

I would rather stay home raising the kids than work at a job like that

raising kids doesn't pay much tho

They can only "get away with murder" because they can afford better lawyers. Affording something is not the same as having a right to something. The poor have just as much of a right to hire the same lawyers.

I would rather not be able to vote than take a bullet to the head.

*satisfaction*

Sorry, but I just don't think that's oppression.

Access to something is not a right jesus christ.

Accessing something and having rights to something are different.

Everyone has the same rights to purchase the same thing.

Wait, voting is a right. Let's not nitpick terms into uselessness.

what?

Now different people have different access to being able to purchase those things. That doesn't mean they have "less rights."

Putting words into someone's mouth is both intellectually dishonest and a lazy way to debate.

I am going to bow out if we are getting lost in discussing the most basic terms again.

Do better @Beef Taquitos

Have you read anything I said.

I said having access to something within the free market is not the same thing as having a right to do something.

Voting doesn't exist within the free market.

Lawyers do.

Rich people affording better lawyers is not a "superior right."

It's like talking to a wall.

Do you lack basic comprehension?

am i witnessing an NPC battle

Taquitos . . . why are you labeling voting like having access?

to me, voting was explained as you owning your vote

```diff
+a wild npc has appeared.
-data input not compatible with programing
-unable to comprehend inputted responses

-Engage target```

i'm not sure how it can be seen as somehow 'borrowing' a vote