You're right. I forgive you.

Now, is there any other topic?

<:TimThink:482277772497125378>

I didnt make a mistake

A shocking claim.

I thought his phrasing in that video was pretty shit

Using a line out of context is not proof of anything dude.

Then watch the video. I don't want to continue this conversation with you, I see little to no value in it.

Also no one is perfect. Tim did not mean exactly what he said. As referenced by the words later in the video.

Tim pool was saying the meritocracy should be the basis of a system, but it should not be the only factor

Maybe he should write scripts then

Yes, far better explanation.

He can be a bit rough when he's off the cuff.

While a persons achievements should hold the most weight, other factors should be taken into account as well

That's what he meant by it

So, you would say Tim does in fact support meritocracy, but believes that wealth should be taken from those who earn a lot to benefit those who earn little.

@Yugure Is my god!

As soon as you start taking other factors into account, its not merit based anymore

@Walsp because energia buran is state sponsored system and each kg has a cost duuh

also objectively better system than shuttle program

Tim explained exactly what he meant by this with an example.

Not wealth

I would guess much more like a personal statement to a college when it comes to a hiring process

"here were my struggles in life" type of thing

So, like the current bias practices, but with class instead of race?

Again, no.

Something akin to that, I would assume

not exactly

Like i said above, the instant you factor in other factors, its not merit based anymore. It can't be.

Modern day runs on the assumption all people of a certain race face the same struggles

Whether its class, or race, or social status, or disability

I.E. affirmative action and diversity

Right. So, he'd prefer to judge people's economic situations regardless of race.

Under a meritocratic system such as the one I described, people can explain their own sturggles and no employer is forced to take them into account

So, if I'm understanding this right, a poor person who went to some random high school is held to a lower standard when applying to a position than a rich person who went to a fancy prep school.

However, they have the possibility of doing so

You can't cleanly separate biological and environmental factors when assigning merit.

Book, your not understanding this right

Even that kid in prep school can face a struggle in life

Okay. So, the more you struggle in life, the lower the standard or the more aid they receive from the government/college/fill in the authority.

People that have faced (and overcome) real struggles generally don't want or like handouts