My niece would know better, she's 4

Anyone I ask would say "That's dumb"

yes, but the law doesn't move as fast as life

Oh

Is it time to cum yet

Fuck off pep

no shit, the human brain is better at differentiating than a computer, which processes discrete rules

laws = discrete rules

I'd like to propose a final solution to the T*rk Question:

Oh come on, you have to at least think about the repercussions every proposed law would have before putting it on the books

what might seem like a straightforward rule with clear exceptions that can't be abused, is FAR more complicated than it looks

they DO

you don't

hence my point

Did nobody stop and think about any of the asinine copyright laws that cause chaos before solidifying them?

Why think about it? Pass law people want = votes

example: people keep saying the gov should intervene, or remove the section 230 protections

https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/6-killed-dozens-wounded-during-coronavirus-inspired-prison-riot-italy

What really bugs me is the gross reactions to things that hurt nobody

BUT if they did that, 1) the gov would be granted the LEGAL right to search ANYONES machine at random and 2) it would utterly destroy the internet business model

both would be disasterous

Two terms

In youtube's case the laws forced youtube to enable theft of advert revenue in a ridiculous free-for-all of claims

and you also can't grant the gov authority to make execeptions declaring Twitter is different from some other no name platforn

Fuck twitter, its garbage

yes, because if they did it the RIGHT way, they couldn't do what they do

it wouldn't be worth the effort

But the alternative is even worse

it's NOT an alternative; it's the LAW

It was a bad law, a gross injustice

Thanks viacom, you PRICKS

you are literally comparing an illegal activity to the complications of doing something legally

if you remove that law, you create OTHER problems

trust me, it would be far worse

It is always better to have the ethical and regulatory control within the industry, rather then being so exploitative the state needs to come in and regulate their stupid asses

agreed, 100%

let the market find the solution

State can never make those regulations non-draconian

don't involve the state

How anyone didn't step in and say, look guys, this is what youtube would have to do to comply with this law, it would completely ruin their business and is infeasible, they would have to create a system that enables theft of advert revenue by anyone, maybe this isn't a great law, maybe we need to go away and think things over, do something different