Message from @ManAnimal
Discord ID: 686549022495997955
by rights, so do most centrists
as they feel YT was being unfair
"here's a snowball, global warming is obviously fake"-A member of congress.
Laughably dumb, incredibly dense, stupid, pathetic
but you don't deal with the mob and expect the mob to be fair
that's just naive
Naive
Naive
n-a-i-v-e
naive
My niece would know better, she's 4
Anyone I ask would say "That's dumb"
yes, but the law doesn't move as fast as life
Oh
Is it time to cum yet
Fuck off pep
no shit, the human brain is better at differentiating than a computer, which processes discrete rules
laws = discrete rules
Oh come on, you have to at least think about the repercussions every proposed law would have before putting it on the books
what might seem like a straightforward rule with clear exceptions that can't be abused, is FAR more complicated than it looks
you don't
hence my point
Did nobody stop and think about any of the asinine copyright laws that cause chaos before solidifying them?
Why think about it? Pass law people want = votes
example: people keep saying the gov should intervene, or remove the section 230 protections
What really bugs me is the gross reactions to things that hurt nobody
BUT if they did that, 1) the gov would be granted the LEGAL right to search ANYONES machine at random and 2) it would utterly destroy the internet business model
both would be disasterous
In youtube's case the laws forced youtube to enable theft of advert revenue in a ridiculous free-for-all of claims
and you also can't grant the gov authority to make execeptions declaring Twitter is different from some other no name platforn
Fuck twitter, its garbage
yes, because if they did it the RIGHT way, they couldn't do what they do
it wouldn't be worth the effort
But the alternative is even worse
it's NOT an alternative; it's the LAW
It was a bad law, a gross injustice
Thanks viacom, you PRICKS


