They're only polling for people stupid enough to give random people time out of their day to answer a poll.

Have you ever had someone approach you in a mall and ask you something?

Don't people with something to do just BLOW THEM OFF?

@Atkins on the other hand, pollsters struggle to measure young voters now.

I do.

Tim's video is about actual votes though, not polls.

Mind you, the votes aren't counted, but you can make pretty informed guesses.

I was waiting for someone to post that. And it's even been "fixed" to use the NPC meme...

lol

I will say this. If you haven't voted yet...you should do so. Everything is in play it seems. MI, TX, WV, IN, GA, NJ... There was briefly a poll showing the R's gaining on the D's in the CA governor race.

Then there's the gubernatorial race in FL and GA.

voting is on Tuesday for me

well

Seriously, everything is in play at this point.

for everyone i believe

So do vote.

https://twitter.com/primalpoly/status/1059157809588330496?s=19

Some of us have early voting.

im curious how the Feehan and Hagedorn vote is gonna turn out

Interesting

Gab is back!
https://gab.ai/Sunless_Sentinel

Winning!

I. E some of the smartest people are fucking stupid.

"Overall, my findings suggest that higher intelligence
among classically liberal Republicans compensates for lower
intelligence among socially conservative Republicans. Interestingly,
the difference in verbal intelligence between those
who supported the Republican Party in elections and those
who supported the Democratic Party (2 IQ points) is
somewhat smaller than the difference between those who
identify as Republican and those who identify as Democrat
(2–5 IQ points). One possible explanation is that Independents
with higher intelligence are more likely to support
the Democratic Party in elections. Future research should
test this prediction. It should also address the more complex
question of why intelligence happens to be correlated
with particular kinds of social and economic beliefs
(Charlton, 2009; Kanazawa, 2010; Woodley, 2010; Dutton,
2013)."

"Two important caveats should be attached to my
conclusions. First, a 10-word vocabulary test is at best an
imperfect measure of verbal intelligence, let alone general
intelligence. Indeed, there is already evidence that the
correlation between intelligence and political beliefs varies
with the sub-dimension of intelligence under scrutiny.
Specifically, Kemmelmeier (2008) found that although
libertarian social attitudes were positively related to verbal
SAT scores, they were unrelated to math SAT scores. Second,
most of the effects I observe are small by conventional
standards, especially the differences in verbal intelligence
between Republicans and Democrats. According to convention,
a standardized difference of 0.20 constitutes a small
effect size; by contrast, a standardized difference of 0.50 is
considered moderate, while a standardized difference of 0.80
or greater is considered large (Cohen, 1988, pp. 24–8)."

It's an interesting paper

Inc essay from dante

God I must be stupid forgetting and asking this question again! Where was Tim raised again?

So, Your saying the data set, the testing method, and importance of this document. are all thrown out by the caveats....

great study

Rip essay 2019

(insert favorite clapping meme)

👌

Who has knowledge on the Optimates and Populares?

So are the Democrats optimate or populare? Or is it the other way around?

you're right - the cited study isn't 100% effective but it is worth mentioning. I'm not sure if all of you have access to the original study because I had to go through my university account

come to talk room 2 and we can find out together

@RanStairs

Democrats were the populares

https://gab.com/a/posts/40151592