Message from @Jasse
Discord ID: 508824042439180303
Hmmm
at some point those will have to get cleaned up
its not the new tech
its outdated compared to what china designed now
we already know what to do with nuclear waste.
most of it can be recylced.
and deblited uranium have many uses already.
Yeah
warheads lol
do you have a source on that
let me find it for you
I don't think stockpiling warheads is smart either
depleted uranuim is so heavy.
thats why it has many uses. but mainly in military as armor and APFSDS "arrows" are made out of depleted uranium
It is in chinese so turn on the subs
I was looking for a source on recycling waste
Oh
my bad
I had already heard of fast breeder reactors
okay
nah it's cool, I didn't specify
Im typing so much the guys in my discord are asking can the Novel im writing be gluten Free. . "mr Smiley " Lazy general : mr smiley i cant see you reading a book i can see you eating the book
recycling works same way as making "new" uranium.
its only those heviest uranium particles that are most dangerous and that are used in nuclear reactors.
so from my understanding, the fuel rods go bad because there's not enough uranium left to sustain the reaction, but they're still radioactive
yes.
Thats basically it
seems to me like a shitty design if they only last a few years but I'm not an expert. Probably not too smart to put too much in or it will go critical
and they can be "recycled"
take those still actice and usable heavy uranium to new rods. and debleted uranium have other uses.
I'd rather invest more money into fusion tbh
I think I saw something recently about the first sucessful cold fusion, let me see if I can find it
WE need to go to mars find the Mass effect Relay . . And jump start our tech . . . . Lol ELON !!!
Today's video. The silent trump supporter still can't be counted.
it might have been a minute physics video or something
Correctly
but we already have perfectly safe nuclear reactors.
and i dont see any problems building more nuclear plants.
but of course if we get fusion working in some day its better idea.
but until that nuclear is best form of producing energy
The problem is that things are not as centralized as that.
Things matter on the state level now
So the silent Trump trap card won't be nearly as significant as in the presidential election.
why don't we take more advantage of geothermal energy?
like I'm sure people have tried to go down this path, we're not the scientists
I think we should focus on nuclear energy until something like fusion comes along.
but geothermal energy is the closest thing to free energy we have (yes I know there's no such thing as "free" energy but the earth has enough heat to sustain us)
geothermal has the same problem as hydro-electric