Nah I'm done lol

😏 😂

theres a difference in "believing, for lack of better knowledge"
and "Believing cuz you want to believe and fuck reality cuz i'm entitled"

Ok, but which is the religious one and which isn't and why?

here is a problem: When humans more or less blindly follow something or believe in something, they can complete amazing things without even, necessarily, a drop in living standards. But when not blindly following, they can get stuck in things like the paradox of choice. However, when they do blindly follow, they are easily manipulated and easily lead in a direction that is detrimental to nearly everyone.

the religious one is the entitled shit one,

Any current religion disproves itself

I'm fine with believing theres a greater being out there,

But any religion is just fan-fic for power

Disproves itself? Is it making a claim?

yes

I'm not religious so, please do tell.

that theres some supernatural sky being that observes all, and somehow came into existance

thats 90% of religions generally

Ok, so how has that been disproven?

By itself?

@Dr.Wol they dont neccessarily say that being actualy came into existance. Just like we have no reason to believe the universe ever came into existance

cuz extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence,

Anything claimed without evidence can be dismissed without evidence

fair point Punks

there is a difference between not being proven, and being disproven

Right, but dismissing something isn't what you said.

well each religion is disproven by the other religions

You said they disprove themselves.

something may never be proven in your lifetime, that does not mean it is disproven

cuz they all claim to be the one true one

disprove =/= dismiss

@Dr.Wol well, discordianism affirms all religions - all things are true, even those that are false.

lets take the bible, it disproves other religions cuz its skylord says there is no other god

how many physicists came up with a theory that was not proven in their lifetime but later proven.

Tbh wol, extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.

Wheres your evidence of them disproving themselves?

By themselves

physicists based it on mathematics though, they calculated it, it just hasn't been "proven" at the time

@Dr.Wol i dont think the bible actualy says there are no other gods. Just that you ought not to follow them

Eh, not sure if this is just a semantic argument at this point.

@Cody what philosophical razor was that one again? Cant 'member

You don't seem to know the difference between evidence and a thought.

proof and a claim

Occam's?

or wait

Sorry to hear your member doesnt get up

Must be hard

Occams razor is the one where the simple answer is most likely the real one